- From: Ian Hickson <py8ieh@bath.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 1999 00:15:02 +0000 (BST)
- To: Inanis Brooke <alatus@earthlink.net>
- cc: www-html@w3.org
On Sat, 13 Feb 1999, Inanis Brooke wrote: >>> Also, would the answer to this question involve how the OS renders >>> text, or is it entirely dependent upon the web client software? >>> (my curiosity.) >> Only the UA (user agent = web browser) is involved. > If the web client software is the only thing involved, then am I to > understand that the w3c specifies how a UA should react to these > conditions, or is it something undefined? It is very well defined (see my first post on the subject) - the only problem is that the current definition is at odds with virtually every use of the PRE block currently on the web. Off-topic bit: > Also, I have a question as to the character referenced. For example, > I know that the ANSI character for starting a new line of text is > not supported in ASCII, or at least, I gather that from seeing those > annoying rectangular blocks where there should be line breaks on > some text documents in windows notepad. The problem there is that MS-DOS (and thus now Windows) has always used two characters in a special sequence to define newlines, while Unix uses only one of those two characters. To be precise: * In Unix, lines end at characters. * In DOS/Windows, lines end at sequences. ...where is the line-feed (LF) character, called RS by the SGML standard (ISO8879), and is the carriage return (CR) character, called RE by the SGML standard. When notepad comes across a lone LF character, it displays the 'unknown character' glyph (the annoying square block). When you hit return, it inserts both a CR and an LF, in that order, into your document. Similarly, when Emacs comes across a CR LF pair, it starts a new line, but ends the previous one with "^M", because that is the symbol for a carriage return (M is the 13th letter of the alphabet). BTW - This difference in newline endings is the reason that when transferring ASCII files between Unix and DOS PCs, the file will always be bigger on the DOS PC. -- Ian Hickson
Received on Sunday, 14 February 1999 19:15:11 UTC