- From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil.kjernsmo@astro.uio.no>
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 21:10:07 +0100 (MET)
- To: www-html@w3.org
Dear all! It seems like RDF is approaching a conclusion, and everybody will naturally rush to convert their metadata to RDF. :-) At least I will. How to insert RDF in HTML is naturally connected to inserting XML in HTML, so I read <URL:http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-xh> some time ago. Thinking about it, I'm not sure I liked the suggestions there. So I checked to see if there has been any discussions about it here, since it states that it is for discussion only, and that it should be here, but I couldn't find any. So I hope to start one. It seems like the conclusion for RDF is that it should be kept in external files. Obviously, much of the metadata of a site will be something valid for an entire site or at least for a group of documents, and for that kind of data, an external file is great. However, some information will vary from document to document, and creating an external metadata file for each document would be rather bothersome to me. My site(s) aren't huge, but I have not found any authoring tools I like, so I do everything by hand (except for a few things I do with tools I wrote myself). I think it is limited how many files I can have in a directory before it gets too chaotic, so increasing the number of files by a factor of 2 is not a good thing. Also, introducing new elements at this point doesn't feel right either. By the time a new version of HTML is up, I will probably create all new documents using XML, which means there'll be only invalid HTML documents on my site.... Which would be true for inserting RDF inline too. Unless someone is thinking about making a HTML4.1 recommendation? :-) When I first heard about RDF a long time ago, I thought it would be inserted about the way PICS is inserted today, e.g. <META NAME="RDF" CONTENT='<rdf: ..... '> It is clearly problematic, but is it impossible to get valid HTML this way? Are there some characters that would need escaping? Things like that? (BTW, I guess the new HTML WG didn't have it's first meeting in October 1988 as it says on the activity statement :-) ) Friendly Tiddely-pom, Kjetil -- Kjetil Kjernsmo Graduate astronomy-student Problems worthy of attack University of Oslo, Norway Prove their worth by hitting back E-mail: kjetikj@astro.uio.no - Piet Hein Homepage <URL:http://www.astro.uio.no/~kjetikj/> Webmaster@skepsis.no
Received on Friday, 13 November 1998 15:10:09 UTC