- From: Rob <wlkngowl@unix.asb.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 Mar 1998 01:25:33 -0500
- To: Stephanos Piperoglou <sp249@cam.ac.uk>
- CC: Charles Peyton Taylor <CTaylor@wposmtp.nps.navy.mil>, connolly@w3.org, www-html@w3.org
On 14 Mar 98, Stephanos Piperoglou <sp249@cam.ac.uk> wrote: > Excuse me, WHAT STANDARD? Yes, HTML 2.0 is an ISO standard. You think > IE4/NN4 stick to it? Of course they don't. And they don't stick to HTML 3.2 > either. I'm currently writing an article/tutorial on HTML implementations > [..] *cough* There's a difference between an ideal standard and implementation. And when there's a widespread broken implementation in use, developers are forced to compensate for it years after the implementation was fixed. And from a practical point of view, a vendor that wants users to upgrade better make sure a new version is backward compatible. As for standards, I've been able to create pages that validate under the HTML 4.0 Transitional DTD *and* look pretty good in older browsers. (When non-CSS browsers become rarer I'll eventually make the jump to the Strict DTD, probably in the 5th or 6th generation browsers.) A transitional DTD was a very good idea IMO... What are the "standards"? Guidelines for good markup that works pretty well on most browsers. Hence no "best viewed with.." messages and less worries... my pages are readable on Lynx. The implementation bugs (with the exception of using NOFRAMES in Netscape 3...) haven't forced me to violate the standards, though admittedly I have had to tweak pages (usually when TABLEs are used) within the standards. My complaints: (minor) that the vendors are busy adding certain new features while still leaving othes unimplemented... I don't think these should be classified as "bugs" and (major) that certain authoring programs create messy tag soup with horrible support for stylesheets and yet have the gall to put an HTML 2.0 or 3.2 DOCTYPE. If one is going to gripe, gripe about the authoring tools more than the browsers. Rob ----- "The word to 'kill' ain't dirty | Robert Rothenburg wlkngowl@unix.asb.com I used it in the last line | http://www.asb.com/usr/wlkngowl but use the short word for lovin' | http://www.wusb.org/mutant and Dad you wind up doin' time." | PGP'd mail welcome (ID 0x5D3F2E99)
Received on Saturday, 14 March 1998 01:26:46 UTC