- From: Colin F Reynolds <colin@the-net-effect.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Mar 1998 00:19:57 +0000
- To: www-html@w3.org
In article <199802280533.GAA10708@darwin.upf.es>, Nir Dagan <nir.dagan@econ.upf.es> writes >The spec states explicitly that the TFOOT element >in a table must appear before the TBODY. > >This doesn't make much sense with backward compatibility >as older browsers will understand it as part of the table body >and show its rows above the TBODY. If I may put my tuppence in, what's wrong with having TFOOT _optionally_ before _or_ after the TBODY? Surely this would allow for the gradual phasing in of this element, whilst allowing backward compatibility? -- Colin Reynolds, The Net Effect (World Wide) Ltd http://www.the-net-effect.com/ Tel: +44 (0)1246 450 901 Fax: +44 (0)1246 450 902
Received on Tuesday, 3 March 1998 05:54:25 UTC