- From: David Norris <kg9ae@geocities.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jun 1998 05:42:05 -0500
- To: <aisaac@american.edu>
- Cc: <www-html@w3.org>
I would agree that footnotes do have semantic value. Much of the footnote's functionality can be accomplished best by other means in HTML, but, a footnote has a vast array of meanings. I think, perhaps, that an anchor using the suggested REL/REV ="FootNote" in combination with some footnote construct may be useful. The only problem, that I see, is sorting out when to use footnotes and when to use a more appropriate method. The title attribute, for example, could be more useful for some footnote-type information. The vast choices might/would confuse some people. With proper documentation this should not be a problem. However, people rarely read proper documentation. I certainly wouldn't mind an additional element dealing with footnotes. Or, a clear explanation of how to use current elements to cleanly and consistently handle a footnote. I have been digging around trying to figure out the footnote issue for over a week. I am translating a legal document in MS Word 97 format to HTML 4 and CSS. It is littered with footnotes. I have been scratching my head trying to figure out what to do with them. For now, I just hit the 'Save as HTML' button and ran it through a converter to change the formatting to CSS. Absolutely hideous code, but, very readable. ,David Norris World Wide Web - http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Lab/1652/ Illusionary Web - http://illusionary.dyn.ml.org/ <-- 02:00 - 10:00 GMT Video/Audio Phone - callto:illusionary.dyn.ml.org Page via mail - 412039@pager.mirabilis.com ICQ Universal Internet Number - 412039 E-Mail - kg9ae@geocities.com -----Original Message----- From: Alan G. Isaac [mailto:aisaac@american.edu] Sent: Tuesday, 09 June, 1998 01:03 To: kg9ae@geocities.com Cc: www-html@w3.org Subject: Re: footnotes One might use footnotes for many things, and there are many possible implementations. The basic function of a footnote is to designate some text as subsidiary. I don't understand why html does not offer explicit footnote and endnote tags, both for the structure this offers to html documents and to facilitate translation between document formats. (The latter reason alone wd be reason enough, but there are clear structural reasons---reflected in the existence of footnotes---as well. There were discussions recognizing this and proposing to include footnote tags in html 3.0.) Of course one can use make shift ploys: e.g., superscript a hyperlinked number. But i. this does not acknowledge the special structure of footnotes, and ii. this does not permit algorithmic translation *from* html to other formats. --Alan G. Isaac
Received on Tuesday, 9 June 1998 07:01:41 UTC