- From: James Green <jmkgre@essex.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 12:21:25 +0000 (GMT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
On 28 Jan 1998 17:33:00 +0100 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claus_Andr=E9_F=E4rber?= <w3-html-list@faerber.muc.de> wrote: > James Green <jmkgre@essex.ac.uk> schrieb: > > > > On 25 Jan 1998 11:35:00 +0100 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Claus_Andr=E9_F=E4rber?= > > <w3-html-list@faerber.muc.de> wrote: [ ... ] > >> I usually choose one of these: > >> > >> For unimportant pictures, ALT="" is the only reasonable choice. (But > >> then, if it's that unimportant, why use it at all?) > > > > My my, I presume you've not heard of HTML 4.0 then? The ALT attribute > > is a requirement. > > Oops. I meant: Why use the image at all? Because until a browser fully supporting style sheets comes into the majority of people's lives, backwards compatibility is a major issue!! Regards, James Green Term e-mail: jmkgre@essex.ac.uk | Home e-mail: jg@cyberstorm.demon.co.uk Homepage: http://www.cyberstorm.demon.co.uk
Received on Thursday, 29 January 1998 07:21:18 UTC