- From: James Green <jmkgre@essex.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 21:52:27 +0000 (GMT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
On Wed, 21 Jan 1998 17:24:53 -0500 (EST) Colin F Reynolds <colin@bespin.demon.co.uk> wrote: > In article <SIMEON.9801211403.E@sf108.essex.ac.uk>, James Green > <jmkgre@essex.ac.uk> writes [ ... ] > >No, forget what the browsers do in such a trivial instance. > > You may consider it trivial: I call it a serious flaw in the interface, > due to the _impossibility_ of providing wording which serves both as > _alternative_ and _supplementary_ information for the object. HTML never gave supplementary descriptive contents. You should not design ALT tag value to be descriptive. > > Unless a > >popular browser makes a display 'mistake' which has some marked impact > >on your site, don't worry about it. > > This is _exactly_ what is happening. The implementation of ALT-as-popup > in recent versions of the most popular browsers impairs the > functionality of *every* page of *every* site for which I am > responsible. I do not call this "trivial". "Impairs"? I fail to see this. > I expect that many of the visitors to the sites I maintain are not only > Internet newbies, but are also often barely computer-literate. Providing > misleading, distracting cues is the last thing you must do for such an > audience. I believe those that have seen tooltips before will know their difference within a web browser - it's not too difficult. Those who haven't will be able to see the ALT tag for additional value. > I don't like it, which is why I'm trying to find a solution to the > problem. bgates@microsoft.com > James, if you speak for the W3C (do you?), then I guess I have no > alternative but to throw my hands up in the air in despair (and go nuts > ;) No, I don't speak for the W3C. > [snippage of irrelevant anecdote] > > > As I said, in the case of ALT, they (the > >programmers) probably made it a tooltip seeing the advantages while > >there not being any(?) disadvantages. > > Semantically, ALT text and Tooltips are quite different. The former is, > or _should be_, for use where the image is unavailable (to the user > agent); standard UI practice dictates that the latter should be used to > provide optional _additional_ clues where the image is an hyperlink. Look, I really don't see your problem: *Incorrect usage*: ALT="There would normally be a picture here..." *Correct usage*: ALT="Pic: Abraham Lincoln" (IMO) Now, following these guidelines, where is your problem??? Regards, James Green Term e-mail: jmkgre@essex.ac.uk | Home e-mail: jg@cyberstorm.demon.co.uk Homepage: http://www.cyberstorm.demon.co.uk
Received on Thursday, 22 January 1998 16:52:28 UTC