- From: James Green <jmkgre@essex.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 1998 15:15:05 +0000 (GMT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
On Wed, 21 Jan 1998 10:06:17 -0500 J-F Pitot de La Beaujardiere <delabeau@iniki.gsfc.nasa.gov> wrote: > > James Green writes: > > As I said, in the case of ALT, they (the programmers) probably made it a > > tooltip seeing the advantages while there not being any(?) disadvantages. > > I think there are disadvantages in some cases. For example, I use <INPUT > TYPE=IMAGE> to allow users to click on a map and zoom in or navigate. The > ALT attribute (new for this tag in HTML 4.0 spec[1] and already used by some > UAs including Lynx) directs the user to the text-only option I have provided > as an alternative navigation scheme. Well, MSIE tries to be helpful by > displaying ALT as a tooltip, which now (1) uselessly informs users who do > load images that they could use text-only mode and (2) obscures the map on > which they're carefully trying to click. (To see what I mean, visit > http://globe.gsfc.nasa.gov/) Took a look with NN 3. Didn't find your INPUT tag, though. I'm not sure how you can 'compensate', either. Regards, James Green Term e-mail: jmkgre@essex.ac.uk | Home e-mail: jg@cyberstorm.demon.co.uk Homepage: http://www.cyberstorm.demon.co.uk
Received on Wednesday, 21 January 1998 10:15:28 UTC