- From: James Green <jmkgre@essex.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 22:05:34 +0000 (GMT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
On Mon, 19 Jan 1998 12:47:13 -0800 Nick Arnett <narnett@verity.com> wrote: > At 05:29 PM 1/17/98 -0500, Rob wrote: > > >I'll take a look at it. > > > >This idea reminds me of an XML document type I've been thiking about > >lately, called "Link Farm Description Language". The intention was to be > >a common format for bookmarks/hotlists/favorites (or whatever a > >particular browser calls them) that could be _shared_ by different > >browsers and _posted_ on the web for others to use. > > This sort of thing is very, very much the intent for RDF. *Very* much! Put it this way, if the W3C can implement our proposal in RDF ready for the next release of complient browsers, so be it, but if including it in a HTML 4.1 version to be ready for the next version of complient browsers is faster, then do the latter, on other words: Don't bother doing it in RDF unless the browsers can support it quickly. Otherwise, it'll be HTML 4.x. Regards, James Green Term e-mail: jmkgre@essex.ac.uk | Home e-mail: jg@cyberstorm.demon.co.uk Homepage: http://www.cyberstorm.demon.co.uk
Received on Monday, 19 January 1998 17:05:32 UTC