- From: Liam Quinn <liam@htmlhelp.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 23:58:00 -0500
- To: roconnor@uwaterloo.ca, www-html@w3.org
At 08:11 PM 26/02/98 -0500, Russell Steven Shawn O'Connor wrote: >I agree that deprecating U without deprecating B and I is uncalled for. >I've seen U legitamately used for underlining book titles in a Works >Cited section. Wouldn't the CITE element be more appropriate? >I can only assume the reasoning was because *some* >UA's underline their hyperlinks. I don't believe how present UA's render >some element should affect which elements are deprecated and which are >not. I don't know the reasoning either, but my impression was that B, I, and TT survived due to their presence in HTML 2.0. (Note that S and STRIKE were both deprecated.) Then again, BIG and SMALL were not deprecated... -- Liam Quinn Web Design Group Enhanced Designs, Web Site Development http://www.htmlhelp.com/ http://enhanced-designs.com/
Received on Thursday, 26 February 1998 23:56:12 UTC