- From: Braden N. McDaniel <braden@shadow.net>
- Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 03:16:55 -0500
- To: "Frank Boumphrey" <bckman@ix.netcom.com>, "Masayasu Ishikawa" <mimasa@w3.org>, <XavePlant@iname.com>
- Cc: "html (w3)mailing list" <www-html@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: www-html-request@w3.org [mailto:www-html-request@w3.org]On Behalf > Of Frank Boumphrey > Sent: Friday, December 18, 1998 11:06 AM > To: Masayasu Ishikawa; XavePlant@iname.com > Cc: html (w3)mailing list > Subject: Re: CSS Browsers > > > Although HTML 4.0 allows attributes to be unquoted, to be compliant with > HTML as an application of XML, which is the upcoming standard, > all values of > attributes must be quoted. Also note that an empty element should have a > trailing forward slash thus: > > <IMG Src="foo.jpg" ... /> That would need to be <img src="foo.jpg /> to be in accordance with the current working draft (requires that elements, attributes be in lower case). > To work in ensure no problems with legacy browsers make sure thare is a > space before the '/'. Hm. Interesting point. I'm not sure that backward compatibility with non-XML HTML won't be a lost cause. > >>I wanted to know if one here has try the future NetScape 5? > Is there any improvements in CSS handling?<< > > >From what I can see gecko (aka netscape 5) has almost 100% CSS1 > compliance. Hm. What exactly constitutes "almost 100%"? No, please don't answer that. Braden
Received on Saturday, 19 December 1998 03:17:13 UTC