- From: Walter Ian Kaye <walter@natural-innovations.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 10:42:50 -0700
- To: www-html@w3.org
At 9:32a -0800 09/25/97, Mike Meyer wrote:
>
> The METHOD attribute of the FORM tag allows the author to select which
> of the two HTTP method to use to request the target, allowing the
> author to select the most appropriate set of semantics.
>
> The A tag has no such attribute, nor any other method to let the
> author select which of the two HTTP methods should be used. When an
> author wishes the UA behavior or rendering of the A tag, but the
> application at the server has the semantics of the POST method, the
> author is stuck.
I don't understand why you would need this. Why not just use a FORM?
> Give the A tag a METHOD attribute, identical to that attribute of the
> POST tag. This allows the author to specify which of the two (or more,
> if they should appear in later versions of HTTP) HTTP methods to use,
> and thereby inform the UA which set of semantics the server will have
> for this object.
>
>
> Compatability:
^---------"i": Compatibility :-)
> User agents that predate this change should ignore the METHOD
> attribute and use the GET method. This may mean that the UA and the
> server don't agree on the semantics of the requested object. While
> this is undesirable, it's also the only current option when when the A
> tags UA behavior/rendering is desired for a hyperlink source whose
> destination has POST semantics.
What sort of destination would that be?
And here's the killer question: Where do you put the post *data*? Do you
create a new attribute for A to hold the data value? It is most definitely
not part of the URL.
__________________________________________________________________________
Walter Ian Kaye <boo_at_best*com> Programmer - Excel, AppleScript,
Mountain View, CA ProTERM, FoxPro, HTML
http://www.natural-innovations.com/ Musician - Guitarist, Songwriter
Received on Thursday, 25 September 1997 13:45:35 UTC