- From: Walter Ian Kaye <walter@natural-innovations.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 10:42:50 -0700
- To: www-html@w3.org
At 9:32a -0800 09/25/97, Mike Meyer wrote: > > The METHOD attribute of the FORM tag allows the author to select which > of the two HTTP method to use to request the target, allowing the > author to select the most appropriate set of semantics. > > The A tag has no such attribute, nor any other method to let the > author select which of the two HTTP methods should be used. When an > author wishes the UA behavior or rendering of the A tag, but the > application at the server has the semantics of the POST method, the > author is stuck. I don't understand why you would need this. Why not just use a FORM? > Give the A tag a METHOD attribute, identical to that attribute of the > POST tag. This allows the author to specify which of the two (or more, > if they should appear in later versions of HTTP) HTTP methods to use, > and thereby inform the UA which set of semantics the server will have > for this object. > > > Compatability: ^---------"i": Compatibility :-) > User agents that predate this change should ignore the METHOD > attribute and use the GET method. This may mean that the UA and the > server don't agree on the semantics of the requested object. While > this is undesirable, it's also the only current option when when the A > tags UA behavior/rendering is desired for a hyperlink source whose > destination has POST semantics. What sort of destination would that be? And here's the killer question: Where do you put the post *data*? Do you create a new attribute for A to hold the data value? It is most definitely not part of the URL. __________________________________________________________________________ Walter Ian Kaye <boo_at_best*com> Programmer - Excel, AppleScript, Mountain View, CA ProTERM, FoxPro, HTML http://www.natural-innovations.com/ Musician - Guitarist, Songwriter
Received on Thursday, 25 September 1997 13:45:35 UTC