- From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@imbolc.ucc.ie>
- Date: 16 Sep 1997 10:53:02 +0100
- To: megazone@livingston.com
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
MZ wrote > I completely disagree. Personally I think the 3.0 proposal was bloated > with more worthless crap that 3.2 or 4.0. [...] I don't have time currently to go back through the 3.0 spec - but for example the form stuff. Especially things like the scribble-on image input, etc. Lots of pie-in-the-sky stuff. Forms are pie-in-the-sky? I know scribble-on was overoptimistic, but I don't see much else in 3.0 that hasn't now been implemented in some form or other except math, and that's just the browsers deciding to ignore a market of few million or so mathematicians/scientists. ///Peter
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 1997 05:52:57 UTC