Re: [Fwd: Review of HTML 4.0 Specification]

David Abrahamson wrote to the editors of HTML 4.0:

>               ISO-HTML Editor's Comments on W3C HTML 4.0
> <META> element
> --------------
> We suggest adding the following description of name/value pairs:
> Each <META> element specifies a name/value pair.  If multiple <META>
> elements are provided with the same name, their combined contents -
> concatenated as a comma-separated list - is the value that will be
> associated with that name.

I strongly disagree:

   <meta name="DC.creator" content="Gilbert">
   <meta name="DC.creator" content="Sullivan">

is not the same as:

   <meta name="DC.creator" content="Gilbert, Sullivan">

Though some implementations may carry out such concatenation, it is a 
short-cut which is neither normative nor advised.

> Note:
>  * The <META> element should not be used where a specific element,
> such as <TITLE>, would be more appropriate.  Rather than specifying a
> <META> element with a URL as the value of the CONTENT attribute,
> use a <LINK> element instead.

I don't understand the relationship between the two sentences of this 
paragraph and also don't understand the first sentence.  I strongly 
disagree with the second sentence.  "Dublin Core Metadata for Simple 
Resource Description" (draft-kunze-dc-00.txt) explicitly states that 
the elements DESCRIPTION, IDENTIFIER and RIGHTS may take URLs as their 

> * The method by which the server extracts document meta-information is
> unspecified and not mandatory.  The <META> element only provides an
> extensible mechanism for identifying and embedding such document
> meta-information - how it may be used is up to the individual
> server implementation and HTML user agent.

I don't understand the reference to "the server".  Which server?

Misha Wolf            Email:     85 Fleet Street
Standards Manager     Voice: +44 171 542 6722           London EC4P 4AJ
Reuters Limited       Fax  : +44 171 542 8314           UK
Fifth Dublin Core Metadata Workshop, 6-8 October 1997, Helsinki, Finland

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual  sender,
except  where  the  sender  specifically  states them to be the views of
Reuters Ltd.

Received on Thursday, 11 September 1997 14:14:18 UTC