Wednesday, 1 October 1997
Tuesday, 30 September 1997
- Re: Web vs. paper
- A less-painful way of adding dictionaries to HTML...
- Re: Web vs. paper (was Re: implementation of FIRST-LETTER - possible problem)
- Web vs. paper (was Re: implementation of FIRST-LETTER - possible problem)
- HTML help [q]
- Metadata naming conflicts
- Re: implementation of FIRST-LETTER - possible problem
- Re: implementation of FIRST-LETTER - possible problem
- Re: HTML 4.0 ACRONYM change, revision 2
- Interpretation of relative URL's in external USEMAPs?
Monday, 29 September 1997
- Why is it still "ACRONYM"?
- implementation of FIRST-LETTER - possible problem (fwd)
- Re: implementation of FIRST-LETTER - possible problem
- Re: implementation of FIRST-LETTER - possible problem
- Re: implementation of FIRST-LETTER - possible problem
- Re: implementation of FIRST-LETTER - possible problem
- Re: implementation of FIRST-LETTER - possible problem
- Re: Netscape's "Open Standards Guarantee"
- Re: Question on DFN
- Re: HTML 4.0 ACRONYM change, revision 2
- Re: Question on DFN
- implementation of FIRST-LETTER - possible problem
Saturday, 27 September 1997
- Netscape's "Open Standards Guarantee"
- Re: Question on DFN
- T->B/R->L text flow (was Re: Portrait vs. Landscape)
- HTML 4.0 ACRONYM change, revision 2
- Re: Question on DFN
- Re: HTML 4.0 ACRONYM revision suggestion
- Re: Question on DFN
- Question on DFN
- HTML 4.0 ACRONYM revision suggestion
- WebHome Improvement
Friday, 26 September 1997
- Re: Method for A?
- Re: Goals of HTML (and XML)? (was Re: Foreign Words and Phrases..) (fwd)
- Re: Goals of HTML (and XML)? (was Re: Foreign Words and Phrases..) (fwd)
- Re: Method for A? (fwd)
- Re: Method for A?
- Re: ID and NAME (fwd)
- Re: ID and NAME
- Re: Goals of HTML (and XML)? (was Re: Foreign Words and Phrases..) (fwd)
- Re: Goals of HTML (and XML)? (was Re: Foreign Words and Phrases..) (fwd)
- Re: Goals of HTML (and XML)? (was Re: Foreign Words and Phrases.
- Re: Revised OPTGROUP proposal (fwd)
- Re: Revised OPTGROUP proposal
- Re: Method for A? (fwd)
- Re: Method for A? (fwd)
Thursday, 25 September 1997
- HTML 4.0 suggested change to 'char' alignment in TABLE
- HTML 4.0 TABLE DTD request for change
- Revised OPTGROUP proposal
- Re: Method for A? (fwd)
- Re: Method for A? (fwd)
- Re: Method for A?
- Re: Method for A?
- Re: Method for A? (fwd)
- Re: Method for A?
- Re: Printing HTML
- Re: ID and NAME (fwd)
- Re: What an international mess!
- Re: Method for A?
- Re: Goals of HTML (and XML)? (was Re: Foreign Words and Phrases..) (fwd)
- Re: Method for A? (fwd)
- Re: Method for A? (fwd)
- Re: Event handler proliferation
- Re: ID and NAME
- Re: Method for A? (fwd)
- Re: What an international mess!!! (was Re: Foreign Words and Phrases
- Re: Method for A? (fwd)
- Re: Goals of HTML (and XML)? (was Re: Foreign Words and Phrases..)
- Re: Method for A?
- Method for A? (fwd)
- Re: Method for A?
- Method for A?
- RE: Printing HTML
- Re: Goals of HTML (and XML)? (was Re: Foreign Words and Phrases..)
- Re: What an international mess!!! (was Re: Foreign Words and Phrases
- Re: Goals of HTML (and XML)? (was Re: Foreign Words and Phrases..)
- Re: What an international mess!!! (was Re: Foreign Words and Phrases
- Goals of HTML (and XML)? (was Re: Foreign Words and Phrases..)
Wednesday, 24 September 1997
- What an international mess!!! (was Re: Foreign Words and Phrases
- Re: Foreign Words and Phrases
- Event handler proliferation
- Re: ID and NAME
- Re: ID
- Re: TABLE in PRE, why not?
- ID and NAME
- Re: ID
- ID
- Re: TABLE in PRE, why not?
- Re: Foreign Words and Phrases
- Re: TABLE in PRE, why not?
Tuesday, 23 September 1997
- Re: Meta use in search engine
- TABLE in PRE, why not?
- Re: Foreign Words and Phrases
- Re: Foreign Words and Phrases
- Re: Foreign Words and Phrases
- Re: Foreign Words and Phrases
- Taxonomies, Dictionaries (was Re: Foreign Words and Phrases)
- The Tags relating Table
Monday, 22 September 1997
- Re: Foreign Words and Phrases
- Re: OBJECT and IFRAME
- HTML 4.0 frames -- marginheight and marginwidth
- Re: OBJECT and IFRAME
- Re: BLOCKQUOTE and Q
- Re: SCRIPT
- Re: SCRIPT
- Re: BLOCKQUOTE and Q
- Re: Foreign Words and Phrases
- Re: Foreign Words and Phrases
- Re: Foreign Words and Phrases
- Re: A problem w/PRE element
- Re: Foreign Words and Phrases
- Re: HTML 4.0 comment
- SCRIPT
- Re: Foreign Words and Phrases
- OBJECT and IFRAME
- Re: Foreign Words and Phrases
- Re: A problem w/PRE element
- Re: A problem w/PRE element
- HTML 4.0 Forms proposal
- Blockquote and Q
- BLOCKQUOTE and Q
- Foreign Words and Phrases
- A problem w/PRE element
Sunday, 21 September 1997
- Re: IMG ALT attribute in HTML 4.0
- Re: Comments on HTML 4.0
- Re: Netscape Plug-ins and <OBJECT>
- Re: IMG ALT attribute in HTML 4.0
- Comments on HTML 4.0
Saturday, 20 September 1997
- Re: Netscape Plug-ins and <OBJECT>
- Re: HTML 4.0 comment - Nevermind, I'm a moron
- HTML 4.0 comment - Nevermind, I'm a moron
- HTML 4.0 comment
Friday, 19 September 1997
- Re: Netscape Plug-ins and <OBJECT>
- Re: Netscape Plug-ins and <OBJECT>
- Re: Site with 'html4.zip'
- Re: IMG ALT attribute in HTML 4.0
Thursday, 18 September 1997
- Re: IMG ALT attribute in HTML 4.0
- Re: Site with 'html4.zip' (fwd)
- Site with 'html4.zip' (fwd)
- Site with 'html4.zip'
- Re: IMG ALT attribute in HTML 4.0
- Re: IMG ALT attribute in HTML 4.0
- Re: New HTML 4.0 draft
Wednesday, 17 September 1997
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- New HTML 4.0 draft
- Re: Netscape Plug-ins and <OBJECT>
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Banners and CSS
Tuesday, 16 September 1997
- Re: Use of core attributes for frames
- Netscape Plug-ins and <OBJECT>
- Re: HTML/Browser Extensions and Object Control
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: Use of core attributes for frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames
- HTML/Browser Extensions and Object Control
- Alternate LANG is unclear in HTML4 Draft
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames
- Re: ACSS
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
Monday, 15 September 1997
- Use of core attributes for frames (fwd)
- Use of core attributes for frames
- HTML 4.0 draft: LANG/DIR inconsistency
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: Browser Stats
- Re: Browser Stats
- Browser Stats
Sunday, 14 September 1997
Saturday, 13 September 1997
Friday, 12 September 1997
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusio
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusio
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusio
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: Sound objects
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
Thursday, 11 September 1997
- THROW AWAY YOUR GLASSES AND CONTACT LENSES!
- Re: [Fwd: Review of HTML 4.0 Specification]
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- How can I get the class from browser cache when I watch applet on the screen
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: [Fwd: Review of HTML 4.0 Specification]
- Re: Client control of objects
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- W3J markup guidelines [was: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames]
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML Elitism
- Changes to the 4.0 DTD
- Re: Compressing HTML
- Re: Worthless crap in 3.0? (was Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments
- Client control of objects
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: Worthless crap in 3.0? (was Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments...)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: Sound objects
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Worthless crap in 3.0? (was Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments...)
Wednesday, 10 September 1997
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: Sound objects
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- HTML Elitism
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: Sound objects
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: IMG ALT attribute in HTML 4.0
- Re: IMG ALT attribute in HTML 4.0
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- RE: Compressing HTML
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- CGM plugins
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: IMG ALT attribute in HTML 4.0
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: IMG ALT attribute in HTML 4.0
- Re: IMG tag doesn't seem to support relative HEI & WID values as standard
- Re: ONMOUSEOVER vs. ONMOUSEMOVE (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: IMG ALT attribute in HTML 4.0
Monday, 8 September 1997
Wednesday, 10 September 1997
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: IMG ALT attribute in HTML 4.0
- Re: THEAD, TFOOT, TBODY
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: My collected comments on the HTML 4.0 draft
- Re: THEAD, TFOOT, TBODY
- Re: My collected comments on the HTML 4.0 draft
- Re: IMG tag doesn't seem to support relative HEI & WID values as standard
- Re: My collected comments on the HTML 4.0 draft
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- RE: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: ONMOUSEOVER vs. ONMOUSEMOVE (fwd)
- My collected comments on the HTML 4.0 draft
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: What is planned for these attributes (fwd)
- Re: What is planned for these attributes? (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: Sound objects
- Re: What is planned for these attributes
- Re: THEAD, TFOOT, TBODY
- Re: IMG ALT attribute in HTML 4.0
- RE: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: IMG tag doesn't seem to support relative HEI & WID values as standard
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: Sound objects
- Re: a "clear: smart" feature in CSS?
Tuesday, 9 September 1997
- Re: IMG tag doesn't seem to support relative HEI & WID values as standard
- Re: ONMOUSEOVER vs. ONMOUSEMOVE
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames
- Re: What is planned for these attributes?
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- IMG ALT attribute in HTML 4.0
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames
- Re: What is planned for these attributes?
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames
- Re: ONMOUSEOVER vs. ONMOUSEMOVE
- Re: What is planned for these attributes?
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: What is planned for these attributes?
- Re: THEAD, TFOOT, TBODY
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames
- Re: ONMOUSEOVER vs. ONMOUSEMOVE
- Re: HTML: Dazed and Confused
- Re: ONMOUSEOVER vs. ONMOUSEMOVE
- Re: ONMOUSEOVER vs. ONMOUSEMOVE
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames
- Re: stupid multiple definitions for the TYPE attribute
- Re: ONMOUSEOVER vs. ONMOUSEMOVE
- Re: Linking privacy statements using <link rel=Privacy...>
- Re: ADULTS ONLY!!
Monday, 8 September 1997
- Re: "Umlaut" in Button and ALT
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: Sound objects
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: Sound objects (fwd)
- Re: "Umlaut" in Button and ALT
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: Sound objects
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: Sound objects
- Re: Problem in HTML specs
- a "clear: smart" feature in CSS?
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Problem in HTML specs
- Re: stupid multiple definitions for the TYPE attribute
- Re: Problem in HTML specs
- Problem in HTML specs
- Re: stupid multiple definitions for the TYPE attribute
- Re: stupid multiple definitions for the TYPE attribute
- Re: stupid multiple definitions for the TYPE attribute
Sunday, 7 September 1997
- Re: stupid multiple definitions for the TYPE attribute
- Re: stupid multiple definitions for the TYPE attribute
- Re: stupid multiple definitions for the TYPE attribute
- Re: stupid multiple definitions for the TYPE attribute
- Re: stupid multiple definitions for the TYPE attribute
- Re: stupid multiple definitions for the TYPE attribute
- Re: "Umlaut" in Button and ALT
- output of cgi to a new window (fwd)
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames (fwd)
- Re: "Umlaut" in Button and ALT
- Re: output of cgi to a new window
- output of cgi to a new window
- Re: stupid multiple definitions for the TYPE attribute
Saturday, 6 September 1997
- stupid multiple definitions for the TYPE attribute
- Re: "Umlaut" in Button and ALT
- Re: a "clear: smart" feature in CSS?
- Re: "Umlaut" in Button and ALT
- Re: "Umlaut" in Button and ALT
- Re: "Umlaut" in Button and ALT
- Re: a "clear: smart" feature in CSS?
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames
- a "clear: smart" feature in CSS?
Friday, 5 September 1997
- Re: "Umlaut" in Button and ALT
- "Umlaut" in Button and ALT
- Re: Linking privacy statements using <link rel=Privacy...>
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: ADULTS ONLY!!
- ADULTS ONLY!!
- Linking privacy statements using <link rel=Privacy...>
Thursday, 4 September 1997
Friday, 5 September 1997
Thursday, 4 September 1997
- Re: IMG tag doesn't seem to support relative HEI & WID values as standard
- Re: IMG tag doesn't seem to support relative HEI & WID values as standard
- Help: IE & NT
- Re: IMG tag doesn't seem to support relative HEI & WID values as standard
Wednesday, 3 September 1997
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: number of characters
- RE: Mangled CSS
- RE: Mangled CSS
- Re: Mangled CSS
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- number of characters
- Re: Logo for user-friendly/browser-friendly/scalable pages
- Re: Logo for user-friendly/browser-friendly/scalable pages
- Re: HTML4.0 draft: comments re: inclusion of frames
- RE: Mangled CSS
Tuesday, 2 September 1997
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- IMG tag doesn't seem to support relative HEI & WID values as standard
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- THEAD, TFOOT, TBODY
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: HTML Streaming
- Re: i18n attributes for linked documents
- Re: HTML Streaming