- From: Jordan Reiter <jreiter@mail.slc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 16:37:27 -0500
- To: "David Perrell" <davidp@earthlink.net>
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
David Perrell felt an urge to reveal at 2:37 PM -0500 on October 22, 1997: > Tim Chen wrote: > > > >I vote for yyyy-mm-dd format. > > Actually, year should not be confined to 4 digits -- t'would be sorely > regretted come the year 10000. > > > In deference to different calendars and pre-creational references, would it > not be wise to suffix the type and allow negative years? E.g. > > -2004-02-03-christian > > David Perrell There has been a wonderful discussion of this on the meta2 mailing list (re: Dates). Basically, they are currently tossing around several other standards used (particularly, I think, in Archaeological and Scientific fields) to indicate years. My personal opinion? There should be a date element (although this perhaps would be better as XML): <DATE SCHEME="ISO 8601">1997-10-22</DATE> Browsers would render it using specific date output set by the user either in the system settings or in the settings for the browser. Ie: (possible renderings) 10/22/97 Wednesday, October 22, 1997 Oct. 22, 1997 October 22 in the year of our lord one-thousand nine-hundred-ninety-seven And, of course: 22/10/97 Mercoledi, 22 Ottobre 1997 And so on. ------------------------------------------------------- [ Jordan Reiter ] [ mailto:jreiter@mail.slc.edu ] [ "I have all the defects of other people and yet ] [ everything they do seems inconceivable to me." ] [ --E.M. Cioran ] -------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 22 October 1997 16:30:33 UTC