- From: Jukka Korpela <jkorpela@cc.hut.fi>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 11:52:36 +0200 (EET)
- To: www-html@w3.org
On Sat, 15 Nov 1997, Jordan Reiter wrote: > I liked Jukka Korpela's idea of the CHANGE element, although I see some > problems with it as well (a great deal of legal documenters would want to > actually show old and new text for informational purposes, and to simply > use a pointer is no good). I think there has to be a way to do this. I just > can't think of it right now. Well my idea was just a rough sketch, but the basic point is that if features for indicating changes are to be defined in a manner which downgrades gracefully, there is hardly any other way than to make the _new_ (currently valid) text the content of an element and refer to the old text via an attribute. As regards to legal issues, I'm afraid we are going to have a lot of trouble due to legal requirements concerning presentation in general. For example, if it is a legal requirement that some text appear in at least 12 pt font, then it's simply impossible to satisfy that on the Web. (FONT SIZE surely doesn't help. Stylesheets don't help, since they cannot guarantee anything. Force does not work on the Web.) Perhaps it would be futile to explain to lawyers that presentational issues (such as in which way, if in any way, the reader can see the old text) are dependent on the user agent and the user, and that we just have to live with that. But certainly it is possible to show old and new text for informational purposes so that it does not depend on the implementation of any elements for indicating changes. One can use tables, or if one really wants to be as sure as possible, just put both old and new texts into a document with suitable explanations. In fact, I think such approach _should_ be used _even if_ there were relatively useful methods of indicating changes, if the very purpose of the document is to present old and new text for comparison (e.g. in a legislative bill or other proposal for a change). Yucca, http://www.hut.fi/u/jkorpela/
Received on Monday, 17 November 1997 04:52:54 UTC