- From: <BruceLeban@akimbo.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Mar 1997 12:26:50 -0500 (EST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
This discussion seems to have degenerated. I'm not going to respond to the attacks on why this group of experts dislikes Globetrotter. Globetrotter isn't designed for programmers. Here's the point: let's tell an average user that it's easy to break single doc into multiple pages. All you have to do is: >From: Paul Prescod <papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> >Of course actual useful code tends to be a little more complex, because >you want to do more interesting things: > >(element div (make scroll scroll-title: > (data ; gets the data out of an >element > (node-list-first ; gets the first element > (select-elements ;searches for particular elements > (descendants section) ; searches for "children >elements" > "TITLE"))) ; with the GI "TITLE" This is going to blow them away. And of course it won't work if they type it in exactly as above because the line breaks screw things up. Writing should not require programming. Paul understands that users shouldn't do this stuff directly and they should use some kind of graphical front end. That's what Globetrotter is. It's one of many. One key difference between Globetrotter and others is that we view HTML as an output format not an internal format, which is what started this discussion. Should Globetrotter use XML as its internal format? It can't. Software is not written overnight and XML did not exist when we started. Will Globetrotter use XML soon? Not likely. Akimbo Systems is a very small company and we can't do everything. Does this mean we are stupid? No. I think what we have done is valuable, but clearly not to this audience. Should it be recognized that HTML is (ultimately) not a language that should be written directly by average users? I hope so. --- Bruce Leban Akimbo Systems http://www.akimbo.com/globetrotter Publish on the web without learning HTML! (Really.)
Received on Sunday, 23 March 1997 12:26:44 UTC