- From: Carl Morris <msftrncs@htcnet.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 1997 17:25:41 -0600
- To: "Chris Lilley" <Chris.Lilley@sophia.inria.fr>
- Cc: "WWW HTML List" <www-html@w3.org>
| > I have | > thought about using CSS to backup and place the slash over the zero, | > not sure that is a great idea though. | | Nope. You could use U+0337 "combining short solidus overlay" which is | a non-spacing diacritical mark (ie it puts a slash through the letter | it is next to) Not fully sure what you mean here, but maybe it will leave promise? :) | Selection of specific glyphs is a known issue. ther ei s the famous Adobe | Poetical font with 57 different ampersands. That sounds logical for the type of font, but maybe not quite so for normal fonts. The ampersand should typically be a "feature" of the font, characterized to look like the rest of the font. But a slash through a zero is simply a readability issue, many printers and video hardware gave the option of whether to use a slash or not. Newer systems though have started "characterizing" the zero by using a dot or a partial slash or a vertical line inside the zero, those to me would be glyphs, and they don't always help in terms of readability. However I am not sure where the "slashed O" came from, or what its use is. Seems to me that if there can be both a slashed O and a slashed 0 (could you tell there difference there? I can't) that there would again be a readability problem. (the last couple of lines started talking about a "slashed Oh") | It's sitting there being cooked up. Although it wasn't a year ago, | more like 9 months. The major outstanding issue is protection of IPR, | which needs some fairly intricate solutions. Shoulda known, thats what slowed down DVD, and of course the film industry still lost in my opinion. BTW, I still say a year ago, I got on the internet on my current account March 6 96, and I remember that 3.0 was just being alpha'd, as it was preparing to beta I know the question came up about fonts and MS/Netscape and Adobe all seemed to want their own part, sure, maybe it was 9 months ago when you all decided to work together, but I can remember seeing a lot of press about it even before then. Oh, the press :) -|- Carl Morris (N0YUV) -|- 1:285/302 -|- msftrncs@htcnet.com -|- -|- Hooper Connections BBS -|- 1-(402)-654-2102 -|- 28.8kbps V.34 -|- -|- http://199.120.83.179/~moreese/ -|- telnet://199.120.83.179 -|- -|- Internet addresses valid from 4pm to midnight CST (UTC -0600) -|-
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 1997 18:25:46 UTC