- From: Arnoud <galactus@htmlhelp.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Mar 1997 19:46:45 +0100
- To: www-html@w3.org
In article <199703032006.UAA22445@phaser.EBT.COM>, "Christopher R. Maden" <crm@ebt.com> wrote: > This sucks in a big way. I don't recommend *changing* the past > definition of " in HTML, but I do recommend simply leaving it > out. The entity is present in the HTML 2.0 specification (RFC 1866), and as HTML 3.2 is supposed to be compatible with what is in HTML 2.0, the " entity should be present. -- E-mail: galactus@htmlhelp.com .................... PGP Key: 512/63B0E665 Maintainer of WDG's HTML reference: <http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/>
Received on Tuesday, 4 March 1997 14:33:25 UTC