www-html@w3.org from March 1997 by date

Sunday, 30 March 1997

• WD-object 22-April-1996 nemo/Joel N. Weber II

Saturday, 29 March 1997

• Re: wish list Ingo Macherius
• Re: wish list Paul Prescod

Friday, 28 March 1997

• Re: wish list David Ornstein
• Re: ALIGN=decimal - question. (fwd) Paul Prescod
• Re: wish list Walter Ian Kaye
• wish list Steven Champeon
• Re: ISO and HTML Paul Prescod
• remove from the list Chris Allen
• Influence of Anders Berglund Ingo Macherius
• ISO and HTML Jukka Korpela
• Re: ALIGN=decimal - question. (fwd) MegaZone
• Re: HTML forms Arnaud Le Hors

Thursday, 27 March 1997

• IETF/ISO relationship [was: ALIGN=decimal - question. (fwd)] Dan Connolly
• Re: ALIGN=decimal - question. Jonathan L Neuenschwander
• Re: ALIGN=decimal - question (fwd) Jonathan L Neuenschwander
• Re: ALIGN=decimal - question. (fwd) Brian Kelly
• Re: ALIGN=decimal - question. (fwd) Paul Prescod
• Re: ALIGN=decimal - question. (fwd) Dave Carter
• Re: HTML Error??? Paul Prescod
• HTML Error??? Ian Wyatt

Wednesday, 26 March 1997

• ALIGN=decimal - question. (fwd) MegaZone
• Re: ALIGN=decimal - question. Arnoud
• Re: ALIGN=decimal - question. William Rhodes
• Amaya on windows Ramzi Guetari
• RE: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format James E. LaBarre
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Stephanos Piperoglou
• ALIGN=decimal - question. Erik van der Arend

Tuesday, 25 March 1997

• mailto with the message Chelvan Sivalingam
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Paul Prescod
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Steven Champeon
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Paul Prescod
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format David Heller
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Jukka Korpela
• Re: Source code [was: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format] Paul Prescod
• Re: "Mailto" Command Jukka Korpela
• Source code [was: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format] Dan Connolly
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Paul Prescod
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Paul Prescod

Monday, 24 March 1997

• Re: Subcribe Josh Hinman
• Subcribe Jim Acquaviva
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format F. E. Potts
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Steven Champeon
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format F. E. Potts
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format F. E. Potts
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Christopher R. Maden
• Re: "Mailto" Command Harold A. Driscoll
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Steven Champeon
• Re: "Mailto" Command Jukka Korpela
• Re: "Mailto" Command Stephanos Piperoglou
• Re: "Mailto" Command D.Erickson
• Re: "Mailto" Command Brent Maxwell
• "Mailto" Command Ian Wyatt
• Longevity and Evolution (was Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an , output format) Walter Ian Kaye
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Paul Prescod
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Paul Prescod

Sunday, 23 March 1997

• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Stephanos Piperoglou
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format F. E. Potts
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Stephanos Piperoglou
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Terje Norderhaug
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Stephanos Piperoglou
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Paul Prescod
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Stephanos Piperoglou
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Benjamin Franz
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Steven Champeon
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Terje Norderhaug
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Paul Prescod
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Ingo Macherius
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format BruceLeban@akimbo.com
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Steven Champeon
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Terje Norderhaug
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Benjamin Franz
• Help! Wang Tiangang
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Paul Prescod
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Paul Prescod
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format F. E. Potts
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format BruceLeban@akimbo.com
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format nemo/Joel N. Weber II
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format F. E. Potts
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format BruceLeban@akimbo.com
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Walter Ian Kaye
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format nemo/Joel N. Weber II
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Paul Prescod

Saturday, 22 March 1997

• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Paul Prescod
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format nemo/Joel N. Weber II
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format BruceLeban@aol.com

Thursday, 20 March 1997

• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Stephanos Piperoglou

Wednesday, 19 March 1997

• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Brian Kelly
• Re: HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Christian Taube
• HTML Tags (fwd) MegaZone

Tuesday, 19 March 1996

• HTML Tags Chelvan Sivalingam

Tuesday, 18 March 1997

• HTML should not be a file format, but an output format Stephanos Piperoglou

Thursday, 13 March 1997

• Re: INPUT enhancements - was Re: SELECT NEST proposal (fwd) MegaZone
• Re: INPUT enhancements - was Re: SELECT NEST proposal Simon Cox
• Re: INPUT enhancements - was Re: SELECT NEST proposal nemo/Joel N. Weber II

Wednesday, 12 March 1997

• Re: Not a www-html matter Arnoud
• Re: INPUT enhancements - was Re: SELECT NEST proposal James Aylett
• Re: INPUT enhancements - was Re: SELECT NEST proposal Walter Ian Kaye
• Re: INPUT enhancements - was Re: SELECT NEST proposal Simon Cox
• Re: LANG + Metadata + unknown attributes Jon Knight
• Re: Not a www-html matter (Re: Upgrading the news URL) Albert Lunde
• Re: INPUT enhancements - was Re: SELECT NEST proposal James Aylett
• Re: Not a www-html matter (Re: Upgrading the news URL) James Aylett
• INPUT enhancements - was Re: SELECT NEST proposal Simon Cox
• Re: Not a www-html matter (Re: Upgrading the news URL) Dan Fabulich

Tuesday, 11 March 1997

• Re: SELECT NEST proposal (fwd) MegaZone
• Re: LANG + Metadata + unknown attributes Stephanos Piperoglou
• Re: LANG + Metadata + unknown attributes Jon Knight
• Re: Not a www-html matter Arnoud
• Re: Upgrading the news URL Harald Tveit Alvestrand
• Re: Metadata proliferation Walter Ian Kaye
• Re: Metadata proliferation Andrew Daviel
• Re: Metadata proliferation Andrew Daviel
• Re: SELECT NEST proposal Simon Cox
• <dfn key=foo> nemo/Joel N. Weber II
• Re: Not a www-html matter (Re: Upgrading the news URL) Albert Lunde
• Re: Upgrading the news URL Dan Fabulich
• Re: Upgrading the news URL Dan Fabulich
• Re: Not a www-html matter (Re: Upgrading the news URL) Dan Fabulich
• Re: Upgrading the news URL Walter Ian Kaye
• Re: Upgrading the news URL Albert Lunde
• Not a www-html matter (Re: Upgrading the news URL) James Aylett

Monday, 10 March 1997

• Upgrading the news URL Dan Fabulich
• Java applet or CGI-BIN Erika Madja

Sunday, 9 March 1997

• Re: Any hope of an interim spec? (fwd) Arnoud
• Re: LANG + Metadata + unknown attributes Paul Prescod
• Re: Any hope of an interim spec? (fwd) MegaZone
• Re: LANG + Metadata + unknown attributes Walter Ian Kaye
• Re: Metadata proliferation Martin J. Duerst
• Re: SELECT NEST proposal (fwd) Walter Ian Kaye
• Re: Any hope of an interim spec? nemo/Joel N. Weber II
• Modification to NEST MegaZone
• Don't let SGML scare you away [was: SELECT NEST proposal] Dan Connolly
• Re: LANG + Metadata + unknown attributes Paul Prescod

Saturday, 8 March 1997

• Re: Metadata proliferation Walter Ian Kaye
• SELECT + GROUP (aka NEST) plus other ideas BruceLeban@akimbo.com
• Metadata proliferation Misha Wolf
• Re: SELECT NEST proposal (fwd) MegaZone
• Re: SELECT NEST proposal Walter Ian Kaye
• SELECT NEST proposal MegaZone
• Re: LANG + Metadata + unknown attributes Martin J. Duerst
• Re: LANG + Metadata + unknown attributes Dan Connolly
• Any hope of an interim spec? MegaZone
• Re: LANG + Metadata + unknown attributes Chris Lilley
• Re: LANG + Metadata + unknown attributes Klaus Weide
• LANG + Metadata + unknown attributes Misha Wolf

Friday, 7 March 1997

• Re: Dynamic imagemaps David Perrell
• Re: Dynamic imagemaps Chris Lilley
• Call for Papers - 11th Unicode Conference - September 1997, California Misha Wolf
• Re: Dynamic imagemaps Walter Ian Kaye
• Re: Dynamic imagemaps T. V. Raman
• Re: Dynamic imagemaps Ka-Ping Yee
• Re: Dynamic imagemaps Chris Lilley
• Dynamic imagemaps Markku Savela
• Re: Dynamic imagemaps David Perrell
• Re: Dynamic imagemaps David Perrell
• Re: Dynamic imagemaps (fwd) David Perrell
• Re: Dynamic imagemaps Neil St.Laurent
• Re: Dynamic imagemaps (fwd) MegaZone
• Re: Dynamic imagemaps (fwd) David Perrell

Thursday, 6 March 1997

• Re: Dynamic imagemaps (fwd) MegaZone
• Re: Dynamic imagemaps Dave Raggett
• Another attribute for A tag (fwd) MegaZone
• Re: Dynamic imagemaps David Perrell
• Re: Dynamic imagemaps Todd Fahrner
• Re: Dynamic imagemaps Douglas Rand
• Dynamic imagemaps David Perrell
• Re: Another attribute for A tag Drazen Kacar

Wednesday, 5 March 1997

• Re: Another attribute for A tag Harold A. Driscoll
• Re: Another attribute for A tag Ingo Macherius
• Re: any ideas for slashed zero's Neil St.Laurent
• Another attribute for A tag Drazen Kacar
• IE4.0 and W3C Standards Scott Isaacs

Tuesday, 4 March 1997

• Re: any ideas for slashed zero's Carl Morris
• Re: slashed zeroes Carl Morris
• Re: any ideas for slashed zero's Chris Lilley
• Re: slashed zeroes Lee Daniel Crocker
• Re: any ideas for slashed zero's Walter Ian Kaye
• Re: HTML forms Abigail
• Re: any ideas for slashed zero's Mona Wong
• Re: any ideas for slashed zero's nemo/Joel N. Weber II
• any ideas for slashed zero's Carl Morris
• Re: &quot; not in HTML 3.2? Arnoud
• RE: Anyone hear of ms-html? Chris Wilson (PSD)
• Re: Anyone hear of ms-html? Volker Kroll
• Anyone hear of ms-html? Chad Zimmerman
• Re: HTML forms Steven Champeon
• Archive of this list ? Ingo Macherius
• Re: HTML forms nemo/Joel N. Weber II
• <USERAPP> suggestive parameter passing for clients Dr. Clue
• Re: HTML forms Walter Ian Kaye
• Re: HTML forms nemo/Joel N. Weber II

Monday, 3 March 1997

• Re: HTML forms Dave Raggett
• HTML forms nemo/Joel N. Weber II
• Re: &quot; not in HTML 3.2? Christopher R. Maden
• Re: Cougar: ready for the public? Dan Connolly
• Re: &quot; not in HTML 3.2? Dan Connolly

Sunday, 2 March 1997

• &quot; not in HTML 3.2? Arnoud
• Cougar: ready for the public? Arnoud

Saturday, 1 March 1997

• Re: Random page updates. OpeDog

Last message date: Sunday, 30 March 1997 03:29:51 UTC