- From: Chuck D'Antonio <c_dantonio@harvard.edu>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 18:17:10 -0400
- To: www-html@www10.w3.org
Paul Prescord wrote: >Creeping presentationism (B, FONT, etc.) have made it near impossible to >argue that >"HTML [should] remain free of tags that apply only to presentation." The >beginning and >end of any such discussion will be: "If presentation markup is so bad, why >does HTML 3.2 >do it?" Which reduces us to shouting down individual proposals rather than >making an >argument based on design, architecture and direction. You're probably right. I can't aruge design, architecture, and direction with most web authors in the face of the authority of W3. Usually I try not to take that approach. Instead I discuss with them the advantages of using structural markup. I explain that they can focus on their content and its organization independant of how they realize it. I explain that using stylesheets saves them countless editing if they choose to vary the presentation of class of document structures. I try to make it have meaning for them. Recall the story from my first post regarding the author who realizes that they could adjust tabs and margins the whole way through their document rather than fiddling with individual space characters. They suddenly saw the value of thinking of an indentation or a tab as something in and of itself, not just a clump of whitespace. Those "aha"s are there for web authors using presentational HTML, why not try to bring them out? The other thing to remember is that the people to impress are not vanity home page publishers. They're authors, designers, and publishers who intend to maintain their work as a contribution to the web and not their own ego. And they're the managers and executives who could care less about whether their documents conform to some technical standard but understand that structural markup saves their employees editing time and opens their message up to the last ten percent of the web audience who don't have the tools to view the hottest in presentational markup. I'm not bold enough to call that competitive advantage, but many might. Chuck -- Chuck D'Antonio Programmer & Network Support Specialist FAS Administrative Computing Harvard University
Received on Thursday, 16 January 1997 18:17:26 UTC