- From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>
- Date: 09 Jan 1997 23:13:04 +0000 (GMT)
- To: dkgsoft@ozemail.com.au
- Cc: www-html@www10.w3.org
Dianne asks:
This has been asked several times before, but I have never seen an
answer. The question has arisen again because I have been updating
my content model trees for HTML 3.2
(<URL:http://www.ozemail.com.au/~dkgsoft/html/html32.html>).
The HTML 3.2 DTD dated 18 September 1996 contains:
<![ %HTML.Deprecated [
<!ENTITY % html.content "HEAD, BODY, PLAINTEXT?">
]]>
PLAINTEXT was originally an alternative to BODY, not an appendage to
it.
Is this assumption correct?
I think so.
///Peter
Received on Thursday, 9 January 1997 18:13:18 UTC