- From: Foteos Macrides <MACRIDES@SCI.WFBR.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 08:22:03 -0500 (EST)
- To: pflynn@curia.ucc.ie
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie> wrote: >> I think most people use the in this way as most browsers present it >> as a space. But is there an entity (now or proposed) that would meet your >> three requirements? Maybe a non-breaking version of an em-space, etc.? > >That would be <code> </code>, I guess. That still doesn't address the ambiguity about its width. There's no ambigutity for ensp, emsp, thinsp, etc., but how wide a "blank graphic character" should be used for nbsp when justification is not being used? Is it a "non-breaking ensp", or "non-breaking emsp", or what? Fote ========================================================================= Foteos Macrides Worcester Foundation for Biomedical Research MACRIDES@SCI.WFBR.EDU 222 Maple Avenue, Shrewsbury, MA 01545 =========================================================================
Received on Thursday, 26 September 1996 08:23:09 UTC