- From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>
- Date: 23 Sep 1996 10:45:31 +0100
- To: msftrncs@htcnet.com
- Cc: www-html@w3.org
See, I told people this DTD is "crap"... Are you complaining about the HTML DTD or the syntax of SGML? whats wrong wiuth REQUIRED or OPTIONAL, no, they using numbers ... just to make sure little people like me won't learn it... It doesn't take very much to learn it. If I wanted to discuss something written in German, I'd have to learn German first. What's your problem? So do you advise browsers to throw a tantraum or to be intellegent and bypass the error knowning what was meant? Browsers should probably handle (almost) all the crud that people can write. Parsers should object, and point out the error. But are you suggesting that a browser can infallibly guess what a careless or foolish author meant? (as I said earlier, I see no reason why most all end tags can not be assumed...) Many of them can. What's your problem? I think, for example, you need to use end-tags on <H1>, otherwise the browser can't tell where the heading ends. Same for <A>. I know some people have argued that <EM> should be defined with an optional end-tag, so that emphasis gets turned off automatically at the end of the paragraph. ///Peter
Received on Monday, 23 September 1996 05:56:00 UTC