- From: Stephanos Piperoglou <spip@hol.gr>
- Date: Sun, 22 Sep 1996 23:36:38 +0300 (EET DST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
My boss (head of the Web design group here) recently sent out a gay little message to the staff saying "You know, MSIE has this great little feature for automatically selecting document encoding!". The syntax he proposed was: <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html ; charset=windows-xxxx"> Where xxxx was some number for Greek. To which I replied that this is not an MSIE feature but an HTTP feature, as well as the complications that arise, and that I'd mailed him about changing our server configuration to sending out that content type three months ago and gotten no answer. But anyway here are my questions: First, it's blatantly obvious we should scrap windows-xxxx and use iso-8859-7 instead. Second, is a Content-Type HTTP header valid after the user agent starts recieving this content? Shouldn't this be done on the HTTP header rather than appended to it through META? Third, although I've got Dan Conolly's "Character Set Considered Harmful" on the next virtual console, and I've had an admitedly casual peek at the various Internationalization stuff, should I use this as more or less a hack to let CURRENT browsers recognise that the pages are written (mostly) in greek, i.e. in iso-8859-7? I can't use things like LANG so I need something that will switch most major browsers (NSN, MSIE, Lynx, Mosaic, Emacs-w3, Arena) to iso-8859-7. Please offer your expertise. -- If my opinions were my employers', they'd be pretty wierd opinions. Stephanos Piperoglou <*> http://users.hol.gr/~spip/ "I want peace on earth and good will toward man" "We're the United States Government, we don't do that sort of thing!" - Whistler and Abbot from `Sneakers' ...oof porothika! (tm)
Received on Sunday, 22 September 1996 16:38:48 UTC