- From: Chris Wilson (PSD) <cwilso@MICROSOFT.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Nov 1996 13:16:59 -0800
- To: "'David Perrell'" <davidp@earthlink.net>, "'Benjamin Franz'" <snowhare@netimages.com>, "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
Actually, there is a font working group within the W3C who have been developing a method for embedding fonts in Web pages using Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) syntax - I believe the proposal was jointly developed by Microsoft and Adobe. -Chris Chris Wilson cwilso@microsoft.com -[- >-----Original Message----- >From: David Perrell [SMTP:davidp@earthlink.net] >Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2096 11:55 AM >To: Benjamin Franz; www-html@w3.org >Subject: Re: Netscape says CSS1 and Unicode support to be in NS 4.0 > >Benjamin Franz wrote: >> There is bunch of other fluff in there (surprise surpise) but those >are >> the magic items for me. > >Great news. Another significant greater-than-fluff is: > >"Web fonts. ... In addition, pages using a particular font will be able >to temporarily download that font with the page so it can be viewed >with the exact font the designer desired. Because the fonts are either >those shipping with Navigator or downloaded to it, this eliminates the >limitation of the Font Face tag, which can display a font only if it >finds it on the user's system." > >The only worrisome thing is the wording regarding the Font Face tag. I >hope the downloaded font urls will be declared in the document head so >that such fonts can be used transparently by both stylesheets and >inline font tags. If this is going to require some ridiculous new tag >or tag attribute then better to not do it at all. > >David Perrell >
Received on Friday, 22 November 1996 16:16:13 UTC