- From: Stuart Young <nakor@glasswings.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 19:12:38 +1100 (EST)
- To: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com>
- cc: www-html@w3.org
On Wed, 13 Nov 1996, MegaZone wrote: > >come up with hue percentages would be an even more difficult task than > >looking up RGB codes -- is there any kind of support for a standard to > >simply list the color names (and more than the typical basic 16)? > > There are already clashes with some early browser releases over the > color names. As a designer I avoid names completely and use the hex > equivalents. I think it would be good for any editors to do the same - > even if they present it to the user as 'Bright Red' save the HTML as > "#FF0000". I think the next question is, is it legal to define a color twice for the same use, and let the browser use whichever it can handle, (with hex being the one supported over color name). IE: say i really want a bright red, but not 'truely' bright. I might define it as a 'Bright Red' by words, but I might define the HEX value as #F80000. That way, if for some reason the browser only supports words, it gets it's nearest equivalent. The question after that, is does this method break any CURRENT browsers? /--------------------------------------------------------------------------\ | Stuart Young (aka Cefiar) - You may be human, but you're still animals! | | nakor@glasswings.com.au - Man is territorial. Violence is our response. | \--------------------------------------------------------------------------/
Received on Thursday, 14 November 1996 03:13:18 UTC