- From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>
- Date: 12 Nov 1996 12:25:09 +0000 (GMT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
> As a practicing Web developer, I would like to suggest that the > TEXTAREA WRAP attribute be (re)considered. WRAP is included in HTML Pro, with the values ON,OFF,HARD,SOFT (as there was nothing in the Netscape documentation on the default, OFF is assumed). I suspect that HARD and SOFT are more likely to be understood by non-experts from their association with wordprocessors than VIRTUAL and PHYSICAL. There are some pitfalls too, such as * what to do with manually-inserted LFs on a Mac (where CR alone is the newline character) and manually-inserted CRs under UNIX (where LF alone is the newline); * should newlines be sent under PHYSICAL where they are those inserted by the application doing auto-wrapping, or should only those inserted by the user be honoured? * You don't describe the default. If you specify OFF, does this mean there is an ON as well? > In short, HTML 3.2 leaves it up to the *user agent* to wrap text > lines. I believe that the *form's author* should be able to specify > how the text is wrapped and sent to the server. I'd agree completely. This isn't just a presentation issue, it can get very important when writing the script that processes it. > I suggest that the WRAP attribute be considered or a > suitable alternate scheme be implemented, if such a thing does not > already exist. <!ATTLIST TEXTAREA ... ... WRAP (ON,OFF,HARD,SOFT,VIRTUAL,PHYSICAL) "OFF" ...> (or whatever combo). ///Peter
Received on Tuesday, 12 November 1996 07:23:09 UTC