- From: Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>
- Date: 12 Nov 1996 12:25:09 +0000 (GMT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
> As a practicing Web developer, I would like to suggest that the
> TEXTAREA WRAP attribute be (re)considered.
WRAP is included in HTML Pro, with the values ON,OFF,HARD,SOFT
(as there was nothing in the Netscape documentation on the default,
OFF is assumed).
I suspect that HARD and SOFT are more likely to be understood by
non-experts from their association with wordprocessors than VIRTUAL
and PHYSICAL. There are some pitfalls too, such as
* what to do with manually-inserted LFs on a Mac (where CR alone
is the newline character) and manually-inserted CRs under UNIX
(where LF alone is the newline);
* should newlines be sent under PHYSICAL where they are those
inserted by the application doing auto-wrapping, or should
only those inserted by the user be honoured?
* You don't describe the default. If you specify OFF, does this
mean there is an ON as well?
> In short, HTML 3.2 leaves it up to the *user agent* to wrap text
> lines. I believe that the *form's author* should be able to specify
> how the text is wrapped and sent to the server.
I'd agree completely. This isn't just a presentation issue, it can get
very important when writing the script that processes it.
> I suggest that the WRAP attribute be considered or a
> suitable alternate scheme be implemented, if such a thing does not
> already exist.
<!ATTLIST TEXTAREA ...
...
WRAP (ON,OFF,HARD,SOFT,VIRTUAL,PHYSICAL) "OFF"
...>
(or whatever combo).
///Peter
Received on Tuesday, 12 November 1996 07:23:09 UTC