- From: James Aylett <sja20@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 1996 10:44:24 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Carl Morris <msftrncs@htcnet.com>
- cc: Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>, WWW HTML List <www-html@w3.org>
> | <BODY BGCOLOR="100%,100%,100%"> (range 0%-100%) > | > | For this you'd need to specify what the percentages are, hue or > | saturation, wouldn't you? > > You would have to assume that they are R G and B intensities. Just like > all the others. But you would have to state that decimal points are > requiered by the apps, since a scale of 1 to 100 is not very big > compared to 1 to 255... This is an interesting point; there is little reason (I am absolutely convinced that it's easier to see balanced RGB colours in hex than decimal, but maybe that's just because I prefer numbers which can be divided by two further) for alternative syntaxes for the RGB values. However something more subtle would be far more useful in extending the web as a publishing medium; define syntax somewhere along the lines of: RffGffBff - RGB values in hex R100%G100%B100% - RGB values in percentages (just to please the few ...) Given the R,G,B delimiters it would be possible to add other colour models; CMYK, HSV etc. From the point of view of using the web to publish documents originally designer for printing this would make for easier conversion; in addition to this many graphics and painting packages support these colour models because they are (in general) easier for artists, printers or whatever to think in than the light-mixing RGB model. If we're going to extend the accepted syntax, at least let's do it usefully rather than just adding random hacks whenever anyone has an idea. The old #rrggbb format could easily be kept for backwards compatability. James -- /-----------------------------------------------------------------------------\ James Aylett - Crystal Services (crystal.clare.cam.ac.uk): BBS, Ftp and Web Clare College, Cambridge, CB2 1TL -- sja20@cam.ac.uk -- (0976) 212023
Received on Tuesday, 12 November 1996 05:44:52 UTC