- From: Scott E. Preece <preece@predator.urbana.mcd.mot.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 12:17:55 -0600
- To: ianweb@smaug.java.utoronto.ca
- CC: www-html@w3.org
From: ianweb@smaug.java.utoronto.ca (Ian Graham) | Essentially, the content design and layout can done perfectly well | using HTML 3.2 , without any frame, java or javascript extensions. Why | should authors be forced to use all these complicated extensions, when | a simple HTML feature could resolve the problem? | | THe question to my mind is -- is this a sufficiently common issue that | warrants an HTML-based solution? --- I think the whole indexing issue needs a lot more thought than it appears to have gotten in writing the specs. It is important to be able to indicate that certain information is not to be indexed. I would be inclined to add a common attribute NOINDEX (applicable to all elements). There might be some elements for which NOINDEX would default to being present (in SGML-ish, I think that means its value would default, for some elements, to being NOINDEX). As I've mentioned elsewhere, I think there should also be a mechanism for indicating that certain elements should be indexed against a foreign resource, rather than against the one they occur in. In particular, I would like to be able to wrap a description of a resource with markup that indicated I was describing some other resource (for which the indexing would be appropriate). Searches for the keywords in the description should probably not retrieve my document (but might should retrieve the referenced resource). [The "probably" is because a search engine capable of doing co-citation searches would want to have access to the fact that I pointed to the resource, and others, and make connections between the referenced resources on the basis that they were referred to from the same place.] scott -- scott preece motorola/mcg urbana design center 1101 e. university, urbana, il 61801 phone: 217-384-8589 fax: 217-384-8550 internet mail: preece@urbana.mcd.mot.com
Received on Thursday, 7 November 1996 13:18:17 UTC