- From: Chris Wilson (PSD) <cwilso@MICROSOFT.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Nov 1996 13:31:14 -0800
- To: "'Peter Flynn'" <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>, "'www-html@w3.org'" <www-html@w3.org>
- Cc: "'heffron@falstaff.css.beckman.com'" <heffron@falstaff.css.beckman.com>
"I'm invincible!" - "You're a loony." Actually, the quoting had a variety of problems - but the core problem was that commas were still terminating property values (CSS used to use commas to separate properties, a long time ago). Parsing unquoted multi-word values has always been easy, due to the structure of my CSS parser. -Chris Chris Wilson cwilso@microsoft.com -[- >-----Original Message----- >From: Peter Flynn [SMTP:pflynn@curia.ucc.ie] >Sent: Friday, November 01, 1996 1:20 AM >To: www-html@w3.org >Cc: heffron@falstaff.css.beckman.com >Subject: Re: Is this an MSIE bug? > >> At the Microsoft Site Builder Conference presentation on Style Sheets >> (on Tuesday) it was stated that style sheets SUPERCEDE <FONT> tag markup >> so that FONT tags can be used as a "fall back" for viewing documents on >> browsers that don't support style sheets > >That's useful info, thanks. > >> They also claimed to have cleaned-up the quoting issues (I think in MSIE >>3.01) >> so that quotes aren't required on the font name unless it includes a ';' in >> the name. > >Good, but they must be lunatics. Spending all that time and money to fudge >round the parsing of unquoted multi-word arguments, when all they had to do >was say 'use single quotes'. > >///Peter >
Received on Friday, 1 November 1996 16:30:47 UTC