www-html@w3.org from May 1996 by date

Saturday, 1 June 1996

Re: Deprecating FONT and CENTER James Tauber
Re: HTML 3.2: TEXTFLOW is confusing James Tauber
Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG Benjamin Franz
Re: HTML 3.2: TEXTFLOW is confusing Joe English

Friday, 31 May 1996

Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG Walter Ian Kaye
Re: HTML 3.2: TEXTFLOW is confusing Gerald Oskoboiny
Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG Gerald Oskoboiny
Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) Scott E. Preece
Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG Gerald Oskoboiny
Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG -Reply Walter Ian Kaye
Re: Deprecating FONT and CENTER T. Joseph W. Lazio
Re: HTML 3.2: PRE, IMG, and tabbing Michal Young
Deprecating FONT and CENTER Marcus E. Hennecke
Re: HTML 3.2: TEXTFLOW is confusing Joe English
Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Dave Hollander
Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG -Reply Charles Peyton Taylor
Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG Benjamin Franz
Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG Walter Ian Kaye
Multipage Forms David Peilow
Re: <p align=indent> MegaZone
QUESTION: <resource>, how would it work? Brent Eades
Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG Abigail
<p align=indent> Marc Girod
Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] Albert Lunde
HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG Gerald Oskoboiny
Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) Daniel W. Connolly
Re: Tables and the HTML 3.2 DTD Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 3.0 -Reply Daniel W. Connolly
HTML 3.2: TEXTFLOW is confusing Gerald Oskoboiny
Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] John Middlemas

Thursday, 30 May 1996

Re: Tables and the HTML 3.2 DTD Joe English
Tables and the HTML 3.2 DTD Martin Gleeson
Tables draft advances to RFC Marcus E. Hennecke
Re: HTML 3.0 -Reply Charles Peyton Taylor
Re: Need a new DTD for style sheets Lee Daniel Crocker
Need a new DTD for style sheets Charles Peyton Taylor
Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] Scott E. Preece
Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] Art Pollard
Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] Walter Ian Kaye
Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] John Middlemas

Wednesday, 29 May 1996

Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] C. Len Bullard
Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Ian S. Graham
Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) Scott E. Preece
Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] Scott E. Preece
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-html-i18n-04.txt Internet-Drafts@cnri.reston.va.us
Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) MegaZone
Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Ray Davis
Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] John Middlemas
Re: HTML 3.0 -Reply Walter Ian Kaye
Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] Len Bullard
Re: HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] Joe English
Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Daniel W. Connolly
HTML is declarative on purpose [was: Web neurons ] Daniel W. Connolly
Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Daniel W. Connolly

Tuesday, 28 May 1996

Re: HTML 3.0 -Reply Charles Peyton Taylor
URNs (Was: New Anchor attributes) Carl Johan Berglund
Re: HTML 3.0 Carl Johan Berglund
Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements Ron Newman
Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Abigail
Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) Abigail

Monday, 27 May 1996

Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements Matthew James Marnell
Underlining, (was: HTML 3.2 Standard Review - GOVPUB Posting -Reply) Charles Peyton Taylor
RE: Web neurons Len Bullard
HTML 3.2 Standard Review - GOVPUB Posting Steven Clift

Sunday, 26 May 1996

RE: Web neurons John Middlemas
excuse Kay Martha Quittan
Re: Move the "neurons" talk, please Walter Ian Kaye
Re: Microsoft Advertises Incompatibility Walter Ian Kaye

Saturday, 25 May 1996

Re: Move the "neurons" talk, please Daniel W. Connolly
Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Simon Cox
Microsoft Advertises Incompatibility Lee Daniel Crocker

Friday, 24 May 1996

Re: Math-mode in HTML Paul Treadaway
Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Marcus E. Hennecke
Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Arnoud
Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Ron Schnell
Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Marc Salomon
Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Ron Schnell
Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Scott E. Preece
Re: HTML 3.0 Carl Johan Berglund
HTML 3.0 Srivastava Nandini
Move the "neurons" talk, please Lee Daniel Crocker
RE: Web neurons Fil Mackay
RE: Web neurons Walter Ian Kaye
RE: Web neurons John Middlemas

Thursday, 23 May 1996

Re: Proposal: New Anchor attributes Craig Tinsley

Friday, 24 May 1996

Proposal: New Anchor attributes Ron Schnell

Thursday, 23 May 1996

Re: summary of proposed revisions (fwd) MegaZone
WebNet-96 Final CFP (San Francisco) Assoc Advancement Computers Education
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Foteos Macrides
Re: Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (fwd) Daniel W. Connolly
Math-mode in HTML Edward Welbourne
RE: Web neurons John Middlemas
Re: Web neurons John Middlemas
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Daniel W. Connolly
Re: CTP's UL, OL, LI proposal..... Chris Josephes
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Foteos Macrides

Wednesday, 22 May 1996

Re: Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (fwd) Marcus E. Hennecke
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Angel Diaz
Re: HTML 3.2: SGML Document Access (SDA) Murray Altheim
Re: Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (fwd) Daniel W. Connolly
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 3.2: SGML Document Access (SDA) Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 3.2: BASE element Arnoud
Re: Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (fwd) Harold A. Driscoll
Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) Scott E. Preece
Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements Daniel W. Connolly
Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements James K. Tauber
Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) James K. Tauber
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Dave Carter
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Dave Carter
Re: summary of proposed revisions Dave Carter
Re: Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (fwd) Marc Salomon
Re: Web neurons Colin P. A. Kennedy
Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) MegaZone
Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) James K. Tauber
Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? (fwd) MegaZone
DUH! (was:prosposal: addition of type attribute to <link>) Charles Peyton Taylor
Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements (fwd) MegaZone
prosposal: addition of type attribute to <link> Charles Peyton Taylor

Tuesday, 21 May 1996

Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Robert S. Thau
Why a DTD for HTML 3.2? Marc Salomon
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Foteos Macrides
Lost Eudora email Walter Ian Kaye
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Brian Behlendorf
Re: HTML 3.2: SGML Document Access (SDA) Dave Raggett
Re: HTML 3.2: SGML Document Access (SDA) Murray Altheim
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Michal Young
Re: HTML 3.2: BASE element Dave Raggett
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Brian Behlendorf
Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements Arnoud
Re: Font-style... Lee Daniel Crocker
RE: CTP's UL, OL, LI Proposal.... -Reply Charles Peyton Taylor
HTML 3.2: SGML Document Access (SDA) Harold A. Driscoll
HTML 3.2: BASE element Harold A. Driscoll
summary of proposed revisions Warren Steel
Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements Daniel W. Connolly
Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements James Tauber
Re: Font-style... Scott E. Preece
Re: Font-style... James Tauber
Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements Daniel W. Connolly
Font-style... Warren Steel
RE: Web neurons Fil Mackay
Web neurons John Middlemas

Monday, 20 May 1996

RE: Fixed page layout Thomas Reardon
Alpha testers wanted David Ornstein
Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements Ron Newman
Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements Ron Newman
Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements Benjamin Franz
Re: Tables Thomas van Gulick
Re: Font-style vs. phrase elements Warren Steel
More on Lists... Chris Josephes

Sunday, 19 May 1996

Re: Tables Drazen Kacar
Re: Tables Walter Ian Kaye
Re: Tables Thomas van Gulick
Re: Tables Thomas van Gulick
Re: Tables Abigail
Re: Tables Drazen Kacar
Re: Tables Thomas van Gulick
Re: Tables Abigail

Saturday, 18 May 1996

Fixed page layout Jonsm@aol.com
Re: Tables Walter Ian Kaye
Tables Thomas van Gulick
Re: IMG TAG Arnoud
Re: IMG TAG Walter Ian Kaye
RE: IMG TAG Michael Seaton
Re: IMG TAG Colin P. A. Kennedy
IMG TAG Colin P. A. Kennedy
RE: CTP's UL, OL, LI Proposal.... Hakon Lie
Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability Hakon Lie
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Hakon Lie
Re: CTP's UL, OL, LI Proposal.... Abigail
RE: CTP's UL, OL, LI Proposal.... Chris Josephes
Scripts, attributes and CRLF Jonsm@aol.com
Re: ID, was (More on list attributes, <HR> -Reply) Paul Jones
ID, was (More on list attributes, <HR> -Reply) Charles Peyton Taylor

Friday, 17 May 1996

More on list attributes, <HR> Warren Steel
Re: images as bullets in <UL> Arnoud
Re: Proposal: List attributes-- <UL>, <OL>, <LI> -Reply Arnoud
Re: Descending Ordered Lists Walter Ian Kaye
Re: Proposal: List attributes-- <UL>, <OL>, <LI> Foteos Macrides
<style> and  Charles Peyton Taylor
<style> and Wilbur Charles Peyton Taylor
Re: Proposal: List attributes-- <UL>, <OL>, <LI> -Reply Marcus E. Hennecke
Re: <ALIGN=JUSTIFY> Abigail
Proposal: List attributes-- <UL>, <OL>, <LI> -Reply Charles Peyton Taylor
Re: <ALIGN=JUSTIFY> Shawn Steele
Proposal: List attributes-- <UL>, <OL>, <LI> Warren Steel
HTML3.2 DTD 15May96 comment S.N.Brodie@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Re: images as bullets in <UL> Chris Josephes
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 -Reply Jim Taylor

Thursday, 16 May 1996

Re: images as bullets in <UL> Abigail
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Greg Kostello
HTML 3.2: HEAD content model Joe English
HTML 3.2: Bug in OL, LI attribute definition lists Joe English
Descending Ordered Lists Aron S. Spencer
Re: images as bullets in <UL> Marcus E. Hennecke
Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability Greg Kostello
Re: DIV/ID/CLASS [was: Constructive Review Comments] Daniel W. Connolly
images as bullets in <UL> Charles Peyton Taylor
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (fwd) MegaZone
RE: IMG FUD [was: DIV/CLASS ] Fisher Mark
DIV/ID/CLASS [was: Constructive Review Comments] Murray Altheim
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Abigail
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 levitte@lp.se
Re: Constructive Review Comments [was: My vote (fwd) ] Albert Lunde
IMG FUD [was: DIV/CLASS ] Daniel W. Connolly
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Marcus E. Hennecke
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Marcus E. Hennecke
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Walter Ian Kaye
Constructive Review Comments [was: My vote (fwd) ] Daniel W. Connolly
Lexical details of HTML [was: DIV/CLASS ] Daniel W. Connolly
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Abigail
Re: IMG in PRE? -Reply Matthew James Marnell
Re: IMG in PRE? -Reply Matthew James Marnell
Re: DIV/CLASS Fisher Mark
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (fwd) Fisher Mark
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Walter Ian Kaye
Re: My vote Lineaer Algebraiker
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Dave Raggett
Re: DIV/CLASS Murray Altheim

Wednesday, 15 May 1996

Re: directory identifiers Mike Altimore

Thursday, 16 May 1996

Re: DIV/CLASS Mike Meyer
My vote (fwd) MegaZone

Wednesday, 15 May 1996

Re: DIV/CLASS Mary Holstege
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 (fwd) MegaZone
Re: <hr> images Shawn Steele
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Marcus E. Hennecke
My vote Shawn Steele
Re: DIV/CLASS Mike Meyer
directory identifiers MIKE ALTIMORE
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Dave Raggett
Re: DIV/CLASS Lee Daniel Crocker
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Marcus E. Hennecke
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Mike Meyer
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Benjamin Franz
Re: Spacing Stavros Macrakis
zorba erik
Re: www-html-d Digest V96 #89 Priscilla Johnson
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 -Reply Charles Peyton Taylor
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Arnoud
RE: Style sheets not in HTML 3.2 Fisher Mark
Re: Re: Mike Meyer
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Benjamin C. W. Sittler
Re: DIV/CLASS Joe English
Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability andreas@wni.co.jp
Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) Walter Ian Kaye
Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) Abigail
Re: DIV/CLASS Walter Ian Kaye
Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) Drazen Kacar
Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) Abigail

Tuesday, 14 May 1996

Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) Walter Ian Kaye
Re: DIV/CLASS Lee Daniel Crocker
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Mike Wexler
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Joe English
<menu>, Style sheets ; was:Re: <OL>, stylesheets, HTML3, Charles Peyton Taylor
RE: Style sheets not in HTML 3.2 Chris Wilson (PSD)
Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) T. Joseph W. Lazio
Re: DIV/CLASS: Mike Wexler: Re: HTML 3.2 Dave Raggett
Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) Stavros Macrakis
Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) Stuart Harris
Re: Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) Walter Ian Kaye
RE: Style sheets not in HTML 3.2 Walter Ian Kaye
Re: <OL>, stylesheets, HTML3, Netscape2.0 Walter Ian Kaye
Tabs, was: Re: For the future - requests for the W3C (fwd) MegaZone
Re: Tabs, was: Re: For the future - requests for the W3C (fwd) Foteos Macrides
Re: Style sheets not in HTML 3.2 Joe English
Spacing (was IMG in PRE?) Stavros Macrakis
RE: Style sheets not in HTML 3.2 Chris Wilson (PSD)
Tabs, was: Re: For the future - requests for the W3C (fwd) Charles Peyton Taylor
Re: OBJECT and FIG, was Take note Dan Scott E. Preece
OBJECT and FIG, was Take note Dan Warren Steel
Re: For the future - requests for the W3C (fwd) Scott E. Preece
Style sheets not in HTML 3.2 Maurizio Codogno
Re: For the future... Maurizio Codogno
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fisher Mark
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fisher Mark
Re: HTML 3.2 Fisher Mark
Re: table usage (was Re: text on graphics?) Fisher Mark
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Dave Carter
Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability Hakon Lie
SRC and DINGBATS Chris Josephes
Re: For the future - requests for the W3C (fwd) MegaZone
Re: <OL>, stylesheets, HTML3, Netscape2.0 Brendan Seaton
Re: For the future - requests for the W3C Abigail
Re: Take note Dan Foteos Macrides

Monday, 13 May 1996

Re: For the future - requests for the W3C Walter Ian Kaye
For the future - requests for the W3C MegaZone
Re: IMG in PRE? -Reply Abigail
Take note Dan MegaZone
Te <OBJECT> draft; was, FIG and OBJECT Warren Steel
Re: IMG in PRE? -Reply Benjamin Franz
Re: IMG in PRE? -Reply Gerald Oskoboiny
Re: IMG in PRE? -Reply Scott E. Preece
IMG in PRE? -Reply Drazen Kacar
IMG in PRE? -Reply Charles Peyton Taylor
removeme Greg Fuller - GFULLER.US.ORACLE.COM
Re: PROPOSAL, Re: New HTML 3.2 specification Paul Fidler
PROPOSAL, Re: New HTML 3.2 specification Warren Steel
browser functions and HTML Warren Steel
Re: What's wrong with <FONT> Mike Meyer
Re: Public input to specs [was: HTML 3.2 -Reply ] Daniel W. Connolly
Re: MATH Bj|rn-Helge Mevik
Re: MATH Lineaer Algebraiker
Re: MATH Bj|rn-Helge Mevik
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Dave Carter
Re: What's wrong with <FONT>? andreas@wni.co.jp
Re: What's wrong with Scott E. Preece
Re: Re: <H1 SRC="foo.gif"> Mike Meyer
Re: <H1 src="foo.gif"> Jonas Liljegren

Sunday, 12 May 1996

Re: 3.2 tables and the width attribute Joe English
Re: 3.2 tables and the width attribute Domingo Siliceo
IMG in PRE? Keith Instone
Re: What's wrong with <FONT>? S.N.Brodie@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Re: MATH Lineaer Algebraiker
Re: What's wrong with Mike Meyer
Re: What's wrong with <FONT>? Scott E. Preece

Saturday, 11 May 1996

Re: table usage (was Re: text on graphics?) Walter Ian Kaye
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Benjamin C. W. Sittler

Monday, 13 May 1996

<H1 src="foo.gif"> Jonas Liljegren

Saturday, 11 May 1996

Re: table usage (was Re: text on graphics?) Murray Altheim
Re: Call for Speakers VidaesLoca@aol.com
Re: text on graphics? BearHeart / Bill Weinman
Re: table usage (was Re: text on graphics?) Abigail
Re: MATH Abigail
MATH Lineaer Algebraiker
Re: HTML 3.2 Maurizio Codogno
Arena / Amaya (was: Re: <math>, <fig>, ...) Lineaer Algebraiker
table usage (was Re: text on graphics?) Walter Ian Kaye
Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability Mike Meyer
Re: What's wrong with <FONT>? Warren Steel
FIG and OBJECT Chris Josephes
Re: text on graphics? Abigail
Re: (fwd) MegaZone
Bandwidth (fwd) MegaZone
Public input to specs [was: HTML 3.2 -Reply ] (fwd) MegaZone
Re: text on graphics? Walter Ian Kaye
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) MegaZone
Re: text on graphics? Marcus E. Hennecke
Re: text on graphics? Walter Ian Kaye

Friday, 10 May 1996

Re: text on graphics? Marcus E. Hennecke
Re: text on graphics? Abigail
Re: What's wrong with <FONT>? was, Netscape invades w3.org! Fisher Mark
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fisher Mark
RE: Public input to specs [was: HTML 3.2 -Reply ] Fisher Mark
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fisher Mark
Re: HTML3.2 Foteos Macrides
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fisher Mark
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Fisher Mark
text on graphics? Melt van Schoor
Re: HTML3.2 Fisher Mark
Re: Mike Meyer
Re: Non-browser uses of HTML Fisher Mark
HTML Plans [was: I am confused] Daniel W. Connolly
Re: 3.2 tables and the width attribute Murray Altheim
Exclusions of blocks from <DIR> or <MENU> Ben Combee
Re: Bandwidth Shawn Steele
I am confused (was: Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd)) schwarte@iwb.uni-stuttgart.de
Re: Bandwidth Gregory J. Woodhouse
Indexing the Web (was Re: What's wrong with <FONT>?) T. Joseph W. Lazio
Re: 3.2 tables and the width attribute Joe English
Re: HTML 3.2 Content Models Joe English
Bandwidth Shawn Steele
Plaintext and depreciated elements Charles Peyton Taylor
3.2 tables and the width attribute Charles Peyton Taylor
MENU Content Model [was: HTML 3.2 Content Models ] Daniel W. Connolly
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... Steve Heaney
Re: Form Content Models [was: HTML 3.2 Content Models ] Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 3.2 Content Models Dianne Gorman
Status of HTML 3.2 [was: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) ] Daniel W. Connolly
Re: What's wrong with <FONT>? was, Netscape invades w3.org! Scott E. Preece
What's wrong with <FONT>? was, Netscape invades w3.org! Warren Steel
Call for Speakers Mike Culver
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Scott E. Preece
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Foteos Macrides
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Daniel W. Connolly
Public input to specs [was: HTML 3.2 -Reply ] Daniel W. Connolly
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) S.N.Brodie@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Benjamin Franz
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Abigail
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) schwarte@iwb.uni-stuttgart.de
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) T. Joseph W. Lazio
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Walter Ian Kaye
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Dave Carter
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) MegaZone
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Paul Prescod
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) MegaZone
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) MegaZone
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Dave Carter
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) Dave Carter
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) MegaZone
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... Paul Prescod
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) MegaZone
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... Walter Ian Kaye
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) MegaZone
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... schwarte@iwb.uni-stuttgart.de
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... schwarte@iwb.uni-stuttgart.de
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... MegaZone
Re: <math>, <fig>, ... Dave Carter
Re: HTML 3.2 -Reply Walter Ian Kaye
Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability Walter Ian Kaye
<math>, <fig>, ... (fwd) MegaZone

Thursday, 9 May 1996

Re: HTML3.2 and the standards process Daniel W. Connolly
Re: what *I* would do with Wilbur. Paul Prescod
Re: what *I* would do with Wilbur. Scott E. Preece
Question Nil E. Alexandrov
HTML3.2 and the standards process Paul Prescod
Re: OFF-TOPIC - experiment TERMINATED! Nina Lewis
<math>, <fig>, ... schwarte
Re: HTML3.2 Foteos Macrides
Re: Non-browser uses of HTML Scott E. Preece
Re: HTML 3.2 -Reply Scott E. Preece
Re: HTML 3.2 Fisher Mark
Re: HTML 3.2 Fisher Mark
Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability Marcus E. Hennecke
Re: HTML 3.2 Paul Prescod
RE: Non-browser uses of HTML Marcus E. Hennecke
Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability Scott E. Preece
Re: HTML 3.2 Fisher Mark
Re: HTML 3.2 Fisher Mark
Re: HTML 3.2 Marcus E. Hennecke
what *I* would do with Wilbur. Charles Peyton Taylor
Re: HTML 3.2 Fisher Mark
Re: HTML 3.2 Fisher Mark
RE: Non-browser uses of HTML Fisher Mark
Re: HTML 3.2 Fisher Mark
Re: HTML 3.2 -Reply Charles Peyton Taylor
Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability Marcus E. Hennecke
Re: HTML3.2 Paul Prescod
Re: IDEA: Tags within the ALT="" text... Paul Prescod
Re: HTML3.2 Foteos Macrides
Re: IDEA: Tags within the ALT="" text... Foteos Macrides
Re: (OFF-TOPIC, for education, Fwd) Science Project Fair DBERLIN
(OFF-TOPIC, for education, Fwd) Science Project Fair Kevin J. Dyer
IDEA: Tags within the ALT="" text... Dan Delaney
Re: HTML 3.2 Paul Prescod
Re: HTML 3.2 Jonas Liljegren
Re: Welcome to www-html! Ray Davis
Re: META Davide Musella
Re: HTML 3.2 Walter Ian Kaye
Re: HTML 3.xx & scalability Walter Ian Kaye
Re: HTML 3.2 Dave Carter
HTML 3.xx & scalability andreas@wni.co.jp
Re: HTML 3.2 and Frames andreas@wni.co.jp
Re: HTML 3.2 MegaZone
Re: Moving on... Steven Ball
Re: Welcome to www-html! Melt van Schoor
Re: HTML 3.2 James Tauber

Wednesday, 8 May 1996

bullets and lines Charles Peyton Taylor
Re: HTML 3.2 Content Models Dianne Gorman
META Charles Peyton Taylor
Re: Moving on... Ingo Macherius
New Tag Proposal BearHeart / Bill Weinman
Re: HTML 3.2 Content Models Murray Altheim
Re: Existing practice Ingo Macherius
Re: HTML 3.2 Paul Prescod
Existing practice Lee Daniel Crocker
Re: HTML 3.2 and Frames Walter Ian Kaye
Non-browser uses of HTML Lee Daniel Crocker
HTML 3.2 Content Models Dianne Gorman
Re: HTML 3.2 Mike Meyer
Re: HTML 3.2 Gregory J. Woodhouse
Re: HTML 3.2 Scott E. Preece
Futility of public forum Lee Daniel Crocker
Re: Moving on... Benjamin C. W. Sittler
Re: HTML 3.2 Paul Prescod
Re: HTML 3.2 and Frames Lee Daniel Crocker
Re: HTML 3.2 S.N.Brodie@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Re: Practical Joke BearHeart / Bill Weinman
Re: HTML 3.2 Scott E. Preece
Re: Moving on... Paul Prescod
Re: HTML 3.2 Daniel W. Connolly
HTML 3.2 and Frames Modibo Samake
Re: HTML 3.0 Mike Meyer
Re: HTML 3.2 Paul Prescod
Re: HTML 3.2 Mike Wexler
Re: HTML 3.2 Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 3.2 Paul Jones
Re: Moving on... James Tauber
Re: HTML 3.2 Fisher Mark
Moving on... Paul Prescod
Re: HTML 3.0 Lineaer Algebraiker
Wilbur James K. Tauber
Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Lineaer Algebraiker
HTML 3.0 Dave Carter
Re: Archive with HTML 2.0 specs Oliver Christ
"Journalism" Paul Prescod
Disappointed by Wilbur.... Chris Josephes
Re: HTML 3.2 Daniel W. Connolly
Practical Joke Paul Derbyshire
Re: HTML 3.2 Daniel W. Connolly

Tuesday, 7 May 1996

Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Paul Prescod
Re: HTML 3.2 Mike Wexler
Re: HTML 3.2 Charles Peyton Taylor
Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Matthew James Marnell
Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Daniel W. Connolly
Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Matthew James Marnell
Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Daniel W. Connolly
Re: Abut inline graphics -- how? Chris Spurgeon
Re: Abut inline graphics -- how? MegaZone
Abut inline graphics -- how? Christopher Russell
Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Walter Ian Kaye
Internationalization Lee Daniel Crocker
Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Paul Prescod
Welcome to www-html! Ray Davis
Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Dave Carter
Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Dave Carter
Re: HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Daniel W. Connolly
Re: Inline macros Michael Seaton

Monday, 6 May 1996

HTML 3.2 [was: Unique Names & content scope -Reply ] Daniel W. Connolly
Re: tables in AOL browser Walter Ian Kaye
Re an earlier post about Expert Systems Protoype Anita Sundaram
Re: Inline code a mistake? Paul Prescod
Re: Inline code a mistake? Gregory J. Woodhouse
Re: Inline code a mistake? erik
Re: Inline macros erik
Unique Names & content scope -Reply Charles Peyton Taylor

Sunday, 5 May 1996

Unique Names & content scope Lineaer Algebraiker

Saturday, 4 May 1996

Re: Palettes and bad rendering Murray Altheim
(no subject) FAYYAZ@neda.net.ir

Friday, 3 May 1996

Re: Color Palette Spec? Shawn Steele
Re: Palettes and bad rendering Chuck Norris
Re: Palettes and bad rendering Mike Meyer
Palettes and bad rendering Lee Daniel Crocker
Re: Color Palette Spec? -Reply Charles Peyton Taylor
Re: Color Palette Spec? Michael Seaton
Re: Color Palette Spec? Mike Meyer
Re: Color Palette Spec? Matthew James Marnell
Re: Color Palette Spec? Dan Delaney
Re: Color Palette Spec? Dave Carter
Re: Color Palette Spec? Paul Prescod
Re: Color Palette Spec? S.N.Brodie@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Re: Color Palette Spec? Fisher Mark
Re: Color Palette Spec? Dan Delaney

Thursday, 2 May 1996

Re: Color Palette Spec? Michael Seaton
Re: Color Palette Spec? cdreagan@indyunix.iupui.edu
Color Palette Re: Color Palette Spec? Simon Greenberg
Re: Color Palette Spec? Dave Carter
Color Palette Spec? Dan Delaney

Wednesday, 1 May 1996

Re: Digressions (was: Footnotes) Scott E. Preece

Thursday, 2 May 1996

Re: Opening multiple frames Paul Derbyshire

Wednesday, 1 May 1996

Re: www-html-d Digest V96 #60 Murray Altheim
Re: www-html-d Digest V96 #60 OnSiteCPU@aol.com
Re: www-html-d Digest V96 #61 OnSiteCPU@aol.com
Re: <link rel=Banner href="navigation-bar.html"> Michael Seaton
"KEY SPECIFICATIONS OF THE WORLD WIDE WEB" DOCUMENTED IN SECOND ISSUE OF THE WORLD WIDE WEB JOURNAL Daniel W. Connolly
Re: CDROM.COM & FixPack names? Boleslaw Mynarski
Re: Digressions (was: Footnotes) Francois Stragier
Opening multiple frames Boleslaw Mynarski
Re: Digressions (was: Footnotes) Murray Altheim
Re: Digressions (was: Footnotes) Francois Stragier
<link rel=Banner href="navigation-bar.html"> Lineaer Algebraiker
Re: Alternate source tags? Daniel W. Connolly
Re: Digressions (was: Footnotes) Daniel W. Connolly

Last message date: Friday, 31 May 1996 23:46:25 UTC