- From: Fisher Mark <FisherM@is3.indy.tce.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 96 08:56:00 PST
- To: www-html <www-html@www10.w3.org>
MegaZone writes in <199603210046.QAA01214@server.livingston.com>: >I think a very important thing to remember is that the people on this >list and others like it tend towards the technically savy and advanced users. >It is easy for us to just say 'use a style sheet', but to Jane Doe who just >wants to make her heading red - she isn't going to want to go learn the >style sheet paradigm just to be able to change a line of text. And I don't >believe that she should have to. I don't believe that she should either. I _also_ don't believe that she (or most anyone) should be using low-level tools like emacs (without an HTML helper) or vi or Notepad to do serious HTML editing. Especially now that the Web has been around for a little while, there are plenty of low-cost or free tools to remove the tedium of low-level markup. Even advanced HTML writers should not have to worry about the details of stylesheets, as a styling UI like that of Word for Windows (or other word-processing packages) should handle the details, letting the writer concentrate on creating the content. We should not limit our paradigms to the simplest level (everything is a tag) just because HTML *can* be edited with plain-text editors. Although SGML has its share of quirks, and perhaps more than its share of complexity, with proper (medium-to-high level) editing tools, it should be reasonably easy for any writer to use. From what I understand of SGML, writing your own DTD (something only a small minority of writers would need to do) is where much of the complexity lies; just using SGML with predefined DTDs and stylesheets to write documents should not be much, if any, harder than using a word processor. ====================================================================== Mark Leighton Fisher Thomson Consumer Electronics fisherm@indy.tce.com Indianapolis, IN
Received on Thursday, 21 March 1996 08:53:16 UTC