- From: Carl Beeth <cbeeth@jacbee.be>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 11:32:16 +0100
- To: www-html@w3.org
>Well the WIDTH and HEIGHT could be percentages of the "main" browser. >Or then we can look up all the currently used screen modes, and the >author of the page could determine. In PC:s there are just a few >(640*480), (800*600), (1024*768) and (1280*1024). This is something I (and most designers I know) have been struggling with for quite some time now. The way I am working now is to use tables to force my layout to fit approximately 480 Pixels. This is not a very elegant solution but it works. Now why 480 pixels? 1) I suspect that most screens are more then 480 wide 2) on the MAC the Netscape new window defaults to 480 wide 3) I suspect that a lot of people that have large screens don t want to use up all there screen real estate for a browser window (I have a 1280*1024 and have often several browser windows open side by side or windows from other programs that I want to see at the same time I am browsing, such as BBedit if I am designing). 4) most screens are around 72 pixels/inch so my page will fit with out reduction when printed. 5) most advertising banners are 460-480, I guess they have at least put some thought in to it. the above are opinions that are not set in stone, in fact, I am still trying to figure out what width to design on. All this to say I would love a tag to control the width of a window. Carl Beeth cbeeth@jacbee.be
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 1996 05:32:30 UTC