- From: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 1996 20:10:58 -0800 (PST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
Once upon a time C. M. Sperberg-McQueen shaped the electrons to say... >be better, probably, to keep these separate. If we use the APPLET >APPLET element defined for Java, the definition of the entity, and >its association with the embedded applet, are both straightforward. Have you bothered to read the <INSERT> proposal yet? One of the reasons for it is to REPLACE the APPLET marker, and EMBED, and DYNSRC, etc, etc... The main idea is to drop all of these vendor specific tages to insert stuff into documents and then replace them ALL with <INSERT> so that it can be universally handled. >Yes. That might be a reason to prefer client-side expansion of >entity references. On the other hand, any method one chooses of This is a major reason for <INSERT>, when the TYPE is define the client decides if it downloads it or not. It is not force fed it by the server automatically whenever the page is loaded. >software is going to have to be changed either way; it can be changed to >recognize a new tag (<INSERT>), or it can be changed to recognize an It is easier to get browsers changed than servers. Most sites do not go around upgrading to servers everytime something new comes out. But a great number of users leap onto the latest browser the day it comes out. >If we are talking about client-side inclusions, then this is equally an >argument against <INSERT>, right? Most browsers do not even _support_ ><INSERT> now. And yet, the list seems to be discussing it without Big deal, any browser than isn't completely braindead will ignore it since it is an entity it is not familiar with. >This seems to me rather a large generalization, but even taken at face >value I'm not sure it's an argument for reinventing yet another wheel. The point is moot anyway, the wheel has been reinvented and will soon be rolling on the major browsers judging from their press statements on it. Note the following: Editor: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> Authors: Charlie Kindel, Microsoft Corporation Lou Montulli, Netscape Communications Corp. Eric Sink, Spyglass Inc. Wayne Gramlich, Sun Microsystems Jonathan Hirschman, Pathfinder Tim Berners-Lee, W3C Dan Connolly, W3C The proposal is <http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/TR/WD-insert> -MZ -- Although I work for Livingston Enterprises Technical Support, I alone am responsible for everything contained herein. So don't waste my managers' time bitching to them if you don't like something I've said. Flame me. Phone: 800-458-9966 support@livingston.com <http://www.livingston.com/> FAX: 510-426-8951 6920 Koll Center Parkway #220, Pleasanton, CA 94566
Received on Tuesday, 19 March 1996 23:10:56 UTC