- From: Charles Peyton Taylor <CTaylor@wposmtp.nps.navy.mil>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 13:56:33 -0800
- To: eperrine@nettally.com, www-html@w3.org
I think it's a good idea, but what about Footnotes (<FN>)? It would really be nice if browsers supported them. There are quite a few instances where I would have used them in past documents. Footnotes from the (expired) March 95 draft: http://www.w3.org/hypertext/WWW/MarkUp/html3/footnotes.html >>>> Ed Perrine II <eperrine@nettally.com> 03/14/96 12:54pm >>> >An excellent suggestion! Such a mechanism would have a number of uses. >* Glossary type entries >* pseudo-footnotes >* Link info detail (i.e., a short comment expanding on the nature of > a particular link to aid the reader in determining whether it was > 'worth the trip'. > --- Ed Perrine > >>Hi! >>I'm new to this list! >>I joined in just because I have a HTML proposal that I think is worth >>telling other people. I have included it here both as plain text and >as an >>attachment (see the end of the text, if you have e.g netscape >browser)! >>This document can be found at: >> http://www.clinet.fi/~wes/popup.html <snip!> >* Edward L. Perrine, II | Macintosh/Windows Software >Development, * >* eperrine@nettally.com | Systems Analysis & Customer Support
Received on Thursday, 14 March 1996 16:53:12 UTC