- From: Daniel W. Connolly <connolly@beach.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 02:20:37 -0500
- To: kennedy@duracef.shout.net (Colin P. A. Kennedy), www-html@w3.org
- To: boutell@boutell.com
- Cc: lilley <lilley@afs.mcc.ac.uk>
In message <16999.9603132109@afs.mcc.ac.uk>, lilley writes: > >No, because Netscape does not implement HTML 3.0 (which was one large document >). > >Instead, HTML is being developed in smaller peices and Netscape does >currently implement some of these such as tables (which they do very >nicely). There is not, currently, a replacement for the forms >functionality of HTML 3.0 What he said. In fact, since this question comes up often in many forums, let me reiterate for clarity: The March 1995 HTML 3.0 draft no longer reflects the current views of the W3C nor the IETF. The features in that document, however, are being implemented, tested, reviewed, refined, and specified in a number of other documents. I just updated the W3C activity statement on HTML at: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/Activity to be more clear on this issue, and more clear on our statement of direction. I updated the HTML overview as well: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/MarkUp/ Thomas: would you please update the "What is HTML 3.0" FAQ entry: http://www.boutell.com/faq/html3.htm Dan
Received on Thursday, 14 March 1996 02:21:19 UTC