- From: Daniel W. Connolly <connolly@beach.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 00:18:31 -0500
- To: Paul Prescod <papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
- Cc: Kay Winkler <K.Winkler@gsi.de>, www-html@w3.org, opendoc-interest@cil.org, carmine@mangione.com, david@cilabs.org
In message <199603131430.JAA05959@undergrad.math.uwaterloo.ca>, Paul Prescod wr ites: > >What I would like to know is where is CILabs and OpenDoc in all of this? They submitted a position paper for our workshop: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/OOP/9606_Workshop/ >OpenDoc exists exactly for this kind of thing, is heads and shoulders above >OLE, "head and shoulders above"? I've heard this claim, but I'm still looking for hard evidence to back it. In fact, I'd like somebody to write a W3C draft on OpenDoc vs. other compound document architectures, kinda like this one on the ILU Requestor: http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/TR/WD-ilu-requestor-960307 Any takers? > is already multiplatform, has already been integrated into a browser >(CyberDog) and the source code is available. What are the licensing terms for the code? > It seems like a perfect >candidate for W3C (but probably not IETF) standardization. Dan
Received on Thursday, 14 March 1996 00:18:58 UTC