- From: Arnoud <galactus@stack.urc.tue.nl>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 19:39:24 +0200
- To: www-html@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In article <26438.9606241009@strachey.ecs.soton.ac.uk>, S.N.Brodie@ecs.soton.ac.uk wrote: > Arnoud "Galactus" Engelfriet wrote: > > In theory, yes. One suggestion is that the browser translates the > > clicked location with the corresponding dot in the original map. But > > I'm not sure how to implement this reliably, as there are many cases > > in which such a mapping would get incorrect results. > > In what way could it be incorrect? Well, obviously it would cause problems if you *downsize* the imagemap. Then you will lose pixels in the displayed image, so you cannot know which pixel the user actually selected. If the image is *enlarged* on the screen, I think it would be rendered OK. Galactus - -- To find out more about PGP, send mail with HELP PGP in the SUBJECT line to me. E-mail: galactus@stack.urc.tue.nl - Please PGP encrypt your mail if you can. Finger galactus@turtle.stack.urc.tue.nl for public key (key ID 0x416A1A35). Anonymity and privacy site: <http://www.stack.urc.tue.nl/~galactus/remailers/> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: cp850 iQCVAgUBMc7cHTyeOyxBaho1AQFvwgP/UBRRmlDc90er0WQs6gqifaEN7EFlSrwA AyvYmIX8P+QK0thJNr+6hSjW1/ytWPRvkCVf+IdN83TDYU1ssvc2q2hP7WFQSooC r7qHzmUetA5SI+q2gguSwTHMxaNlCDMAm34EnLYhPQQU74OBwh8tR1KidCSdUIZq ORfbiPgLkic= =vWwy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 24 June 1996 14:51:50 UTC