Monday, 1 July 1996
- Re: www-html-d Digest V96 #135
- RE: Introducing NetscapeML
- Re: Introducing NetscapeML
- Re: Introducing NetscapeML
Sunday, 30 June 1996
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Re: new anchor type?
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Block "mail failure" messages?
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Re: Introducing NetscapeML
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Re: Introducing NetscapeML
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Re: new anchor type?
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Re: Introducing NetscapeML
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Re: Introducing NetscapeML
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Re: Introducing NetscapeML
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Re: Introducing NetscapeML
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- Mail failure
- RE: Commitment to Standards
- RE: Introducing NetscapeML
- RE: Introducing NetscapeML
- Re: Commitment to Standards
- Re: Introducing NetscapeML
- RE: Commitment to Standards
- Re: Introducing NetscapeML
- Commitment to Standards
- Re: Introducing NetscapeML
- Re: Introducing NetscapeML
- Re: Introducing NetscapeML
- Re: Introducing NetscapeML
- Re: Introducing NetscapeML
Saturday, 29 June 1996
- Re: Introducing NetscapeML
- Introducing NetscapeML
- Re: new anchor type?
- Re: new anchor type?
- Re: Valid Editors; Frames DTD
Friday, 28 June 1996
Saturday, 29 June 1996
Friday, 28 June 1996
Thursday, 27 June 1996
- RE: Valid Editors; Frames DTD
- RE: Valid Editors; Frames DTD
- Re: new anchor type?
- Re: new anchor type?
- Re: new anchor type?
- Re: Subject indexing
- Re: new anchor type?
- RE: new anchor type?
- Subject indexing
- RE: new anchor type?
- Re: new anchor type?
- Re: new anchor type?
- Re: Is markup allowed in attribute values?
- RE: new anchor type?
- Re: new anchor type?
- RE: Valid Editors; Frames DTD
- Re: new anchor type?
- Re: new anchor type?
- Re: new anchor type?
- RE: Valid Editors; Frames DTD
- RE: new anchor type?
- Footnotes/Definitions
- Re: Scaling Image Maps
- Re: Is markup allowed in attribute values?
Wednesday, 26 June 1996
- Re: Efficient linking between sections of different documents
- Re: new anchor type?
- Re: Is markup allowed in attribute values?
- Re: Valid Editors; Frames DTD
- Is markup allowed in attribute values?
- Re: new anchor type?
- Re: new anchor type?
- Re: Images in Horizontal rules......
- Re: Valid Editors; Frames DTD
- Re: Valid Editors; Frames DTD
- job opportunity
- Re: new anchor type?
- Re: Efficient linking between sections of different documents
- Re: new anchor type?
- new anchor type?
- Re: Valid Editors; Frames DTD
- Valid Editors; Frames DTD
- Re: Efficient linking between sections of different documents
- Efficient linking between sections of different documents
Tuesday, 25 June 1996
Monday, 24 June 1996
- Re: Images in Horizontal rules......
- Re: Images in Horizontal rules......
- Re: Images in Horizontal rules......
- UPDATE: Mathematical expressions on the Web!
Sunday, 23 June 1996
- Re: comment on draft-ietf-html-i18n-04.txt
- Re: Images in Horizontal rules......
- Re: Images in Horizontal rules......
- Re: Images in Horizontal rules...... (fwd)
- Re: Arena / Amaya (was: Re: <math>, <fig>, ...)
- Premature Version numbers [was: SRC attribute for HR/UL/DIR/MENU? ]
Saturday, 22 June 1996
- Re: Images in Horizontal rules......
- Re: Images in Horizontal rules......
- Re: Aha, so that's what HTML is! (hahaha)
- Re: Aha, so that's what HTML is! (hahaha)
- Re: Aha, so that's what HTML is! (hahaha)
Friday, 21 June 1996
- Re: BLOCK and page breaks????
- BLOCK and page breaks????
- Aha, so that's what HTML is! (hahaha)
- Re: ID attribute...
- ID attribute... (fwd)
- ID attribute...
- RE: Controlling page breaks in printouts
- Re: Controlling page breaks in printouts -Reply
- RE: Controlling page breaks in printouts
- Re: Controlling page breaks in printouts
- Re: Images in Horizontal rules......
- Re: Controlling page breaks in printouts
- Re: Controlling page breaks in printouts
- RE: Controlling page breaks in printouts
- RE: Controlling page breaks in printouts
- Controlling page breaks in printouts
- Images in Horizontal rules......
- Re: Tricky Form
Thursday, 20 June 1996
- Re: Tricky Form
- Re: comment on draft-ietf-html-i18n-04.txt
- Re: Tricky Form
- Re: Tricky Form
- Re: comment on draft-ietf-html-i18n-04.txt
- Re: Tricky Form
Wednesday, 19 June 1996
- Re: Tricky Form
- Re: Tricky Form
- Re: Images as Horizontal Rules and List Item Bullets -Reply
- Re: Tricky Form
- Re: http://www.belgacom.be/
- Re: http://www.belgacom.be/
- Re: Images as Horizontal Rules and List Item Bullets
- Re: http://www.belgacom.be/
Tuesday, 18 June 1996
Wednesday, 19 June 1996
Tuesday, 18 June 1996
- Re: SRC attribute for HR/UL/DIR/MENU? -Reply
- Re: Arena / Amaya (was: Re: <math>, <fig>, ...)
- Re: Tricky Form
- Re: Tricky Form
- Tricky Form
Monday, 17 June 1996
- Re: SRC attribute for HR/UL/DIR/MENU?
- Re: SRC attribute for HR/UL/DIR/MENU?
- Re: SRC attribute for HR/UL/DIR/MENU?
- RE: SRC attribute for HR/UL/DIR/MENU?
- RE: SRC attribute for HR/UL/DIR/MENU?
- Re: SRC attribute for HR/UL/DIR/MENU?
- Re: SRC attribute for HR/UL/DIR/MENU?
- Re: SRC attribute for HR/UL/DIR/MENU?
- Re: SRC attribute for HR/UL/DIR/MENU?
- Re: SRC attribute for HR/UL/DIR/MENU?
- Re: SRC attribute for HR/UL/DIR/MENU?
Sunday, 16 June 1996
Saturday, 15 June 1996
- apology
- Re: Setting tab size in PRE
- Re: SRC attribute for HR/UL/DIR/MENU?
- Setting tab size in PRE
- Re: SRC attribute for HR/UL/DIR/MENU?
Friday, 14 June 1996
- Re: class attribute
- SRC attribute for HR/UL/DIR/MENU?
- Re: Arena / Amaya (was: Re: <math>, <fig>, ...)
- Re: HEIGHT attribute for <TR>
- help context
- Re: What about an <INSERT HREF="foo.txt"> tag ? (fwd)
- Re: Comments in HTML (fwd)
- Re: Comments in HTML (fwd)
- Re: Arena / Amaya (was: Re: <math>, <fig>, ...)
- class attribute
- Re: Arena / Amaya (was: Re: <math>, <fig>, ...)
- Re: Netscape doin' their own thang ..
- shopping baskets w/o dynamic documents (proposal)
- Re: Last Call: Internationalization of the Hypertext Markup
- Re: HEIGHT attribute for <TR>
- Last Call: Internationalization of the Hypertext Markup Language to Proposed Standard -
Thursday, 13 June 1996
- proposal ? (fwd)
- What about an <INSERT HREF="foo.txt"> tag ? (fwd)
- Re: Comments in HTML (fwd)
- Last Call: Internationalization of the Hypertext Markup Language to Proposed Standard
- Re: www-html-d Digest V96 #110
- Re: HEIGHT attribute for <TR>
- HEIGHT attribute for <TR>
- HTML Architecture (was: What about an <INSERT HREF="foo.txt"> tag ?)
- proposal ?
- Re: What about an <INSERT HREF="foo.txt"> tag ?
- Re: What about an <INSERT HREF="foo.txt"> tag ?
- Re: What about an <INSERT HREF="foo.txt"> tag ?
- What about an <INSERT HREF="foo.txt"> tag ?
- Re: <FONT> <FONT> <FONT>
Wednesday, 12 June 1996
- RE: IETF HTML V. 2.0 Question
- Re: Comments in HTML
- RE: IETF HTML V. 2.0 Question
- Re: Comments in HTML
- Re: Comments in HTML
- <FONT> <FONT> <FONT>
Thursday, 13 June 1996
Wednesday, 12 June 1996
- Re: Comments in HTML (fwd)
- Re: Comments in HTML (fwd)
- Re: Just when you thought it was safe...
- RE: IETF HTML V. 2.0 Question
- Just when you thought it was safe...
Tuesday, 11 June 1996
- Re: Comments in HTML (fwd)
- Re[2]: Comments in HTML (fwd)
- Re: Comments in HTML (fwd)
- Re: Comments in HTML (fwd)
- Re: www-html-d Digest V96 #109
- Re[2]: Comments in HTML (fwd)
- Re: Comments in HTML (fwd)
- Re: Comments in HTML (fwd)
Monday, 10 June 1996
Tuesday, 11 June 1996
Monday, 10 June 1996
- Re: comments again ....
- comments again ....
- Re: Comments in HTML
- Re: The <address> element. ERROR in the html 3.2 dtd
- Comments in HTML
- Re: The <address> element. ERROR in the html 3.2 dtd
- Frames
- Re: The <address> element. ERROR in the html 3.2 dtd (fwd)
Sunday, 9 June 1996
- Re: The <address> element. ERROR in the html 3.2 dtd
- The <address> element. ERROR in the html 3.2 dtd
Saturday, 8 June 1996
Friday, 7 June 1996
Thursday, 6 June 1996
- Fixing errors in HTML (fwd)
- Fixing errors in HTML
- Re: IETF HTML V. 2.0 Question
- HTML 3
- HTML 3
- Re: Mathematics on the Web: prototype available
- Re: Mathematics on the Web: prototype available
- IETF HTML V. 2.0 Question
Wednesday, 5 June 1996
Tuesday, 4 June 1996
Wednesday, 5 June 1996
- Mathematics on the Web: prototype available
- Re: no replies yet on Forms in Table Cells !?
- Re: HTML3.2?
Tuesday, 4 June 1996
Wednesday, 5 June 1996
Tuesday, 4 June 1996
- Re: Java and HTML and well known socket numbers (fwd)
- Re: Java and HTML and well known socket numbers
- Re: Java and HTML and well known socket numbers
- Re: Java and HTML and well known socket numbers
- Re: Java and HTML and well known socket numbers
Monday, 3 June 1996
Tuesday, 4 June 1996
- Re: Java and HTML and well known socket numbers
- Re: Java and HTML and well known socket numbers
- Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG
- Re: Java and HTML and well known socket numbers
- Re: Java and HTML and well known socket numbers
- Re: Java and HTML and well known socket numbers
- Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG
- FONT again?
- Re: Java and HTML and well known socket numbers
- Re: Java and HTML and well known socket numbers
Monday, 3 June 1996
- anchor text as default parameter
- Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG
- Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG
- Math markup status?
- Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG
- Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG
- Re: Java and HTML and well known socket numbers
- Re: HTML 3.2: PRE should not exclude IMG
- HTML 3.0