- From: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 1996 18:26:58 +1700 (PDT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
Once upon a time Terje Norderhaug shaped the electrons to say... >I suggest to resolve the issue by that the guidelines for how a browser >should render the EM element is changed from advising italics to advising >that the EM is rendered with underline. Never happen. People expect EM to be italics in all major browsers, I know I would not be alone it screaming my objections if that were even considered. Besides, people would just start using <I> if that change happened. >Italics fonts doesn't display very well on screen anyway, and makes text >harder to read (if readbable at all). Rendering EM with italics also mixes Looks lovely on my system, so speak for yourself. >with the common rendering of citations. By not providing U but rather >suggest underline for EM, it would invite more people to use the logical EM >element with the associated long term advantages. For legal documents you *MUST* have underlining, no ambiguity. They need a *physical* markup, NOT a *logical* markup that may change on the whim of a browser manufactuer. -MZ -- Livingston Enterprises - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs Phone: 800-458-9966 510-426-0770 FAX: 510-426-8951 megazone@livingston.com For support requests: support@livingston.com <http://www.livingston.com/> Snail mail: 6920 Koll Center Parkway #220, Pleasanton, CA 94566
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 1996 21:27:05 UTC