- From: MegaZone <megazone@livingston.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 1996 20:45:13 -0700 (PDT)
- To: www-html@w3.org
Once upon a time David Perrell shaped the electrons to say... >The formalism itself should not be a hack. If a script cannot currently >be legal SGML content, then either a content type should be devised >that works or SCRIPT should not be formalized in its current form at >all. I was pondering this over the weekend, but I'm handicapped in that I came from HTML and have been learning SGML only as time permits (ha!) so I don't have the skill needed... We've been arguing about how CDATA or PCDATA both have problems. Well, can we define a new type - say SDATA (Script DATA) such that it handles inline scripting and can be handled as another data type in SGML without hacking up existing scripts? Another question - <SCRIPT SRC="data:..."></SCRIPT> Can someone give me the URL to investigate data: URLs, I'd like to see how multiline scripts would be inlined. (How do the line returns get coded, does it handle actual returns in the file to line wrap cleanly, etc) -MZ -- Livingston Enterprises - Chair, Department of Interstitial Affairs Phone: 800-458-9966 510-426-0770 FAX: 510-426-8951 megazone@livingston.com For support requests: support@livingston.com <http://www.livingston.com/> Snail mail: 6920 Koll Center Parkway #220, Pleasanton, CA 94566
Received on Monday, 29 July 1996 23:45:19 UTC