- From: Arnoud <galactus@stack.urc.tue.nl>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jul 1996 19:35:27 +0200
- To: www-html@w3.org
In article <199607211517.LAA22821@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca>, Paul Prescod <papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> wrote: > > It would require a lot of careful coding to do this with style sheets. > > What if you use the same bullet for two different lists, and decide > > to switch bullets in one of the lists? You would also be changing the > > appearance of the other list. > > If the lists are semantically connected, then when one changes the other > should too. If the lists are not semantically connected (I.e. lists of the same > "type"), then they should have different classes. It's a simple rule. This would then mean that I end up with, say, ten classes which all indicate a red ball as bullet for the list. Hm. But again, if inline style markup is going to be in Cougar (the STYLE attribute), why not allow 'shortcuts' for certain often-used constructs? It would be similar to having <CENTER> next to <DIV ALIGN=CENTER>, or <FONT FACE=times> next to <SPAN STYLE="font: times">. Galactus PS: My CSS1 is a bit rusty, but I hope you get the idea. -- To find out more about PGP, send mail with HELP PGP in the SUBJECT line to me. E-mail: galactus@stack.urc.tue.nl - Please PGP encrypt your mail if you can. Finger galactus@turtle.stack.urc.tue.nl for public key (key ID 0x416A1A35). Anonymity and privacy site: <http://www.stack.urc.tue.nl/~galactus/remailers/>
Received on Sunday, 21 July 1996 14:05:14 UTC