- From: Charles Peyton Taylor <CTaylor@wposmtp.nps.navy.mil>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 1996 14:15:05 -0800
- To: www-html@w3.org
Would there be a problem if the Browser displayed "e; using the german glyphs if it was a german browser and " if it was an english browser? The only problem I can see is with code. Also, what about the <q> from the much-mourned HTML 3? I suppose it wouldn't be very backward-compatible to render this: <p> she said <q>Hey babe, take a walk on the wild side </q> as She said "Hey Babe, take a walk on the wild side" since HTML 2 browsers would just ignore the <q>'s. But this does seem to go well with the idea of content-based markup. Charles Taylor >>> Frank Wegmann <wegmann@linguistics.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> 07/11/96 03:44am >>> > >> Ah, but not German? :-) >> I may as well be the first to suggest adding to these: >> > <!ENTITY ldquor CDATA "„" -- rising dbl quote, left >(low) --> >> <!ENTITY lsquor CDATA "‚" -- rising single quote, left >(low) --> >> > Do we then need these, or do they necessarily map to the >same >> character as rdquo and rsquo? (Perhaps I should have left such >> avocation to somone who writes the language.) >> > <!ENTITY rdquor CDATA "[rdquor]"--=rising dbl quote, right >(high)--> >> <!ENTITY rsquor CDATA "[rdquor]"--=rising single quote, right >(high)--> >> > >Actually, you need both types of quote in order to write German >in the proper way. In so far I also support your argument of >sticking to the ISO >8879 names. > > >Frank Wegmann > >=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+= >=+=+=+=+=+=+ >Frank Wegmann voice: +49 234 700 24 61 >Sprachwiss. Institut fax : +49 234 70 94 137 >Ruhr-Universitaet Bochum Internet : >wegmann@linguistics.ruhr-uni-bochum.de >44780 Bochum X.400: G=Frank; S=Wegmann; OU1=rz; OU2=ruba; >Germany PRMD=ruhr-uni-bochum; ADMD=d400; C=de >=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+= >=+=+=+=+=+=+ >
Received on Thursday, 11 July 1996 17:18:14 UTC