- From: Scott E. Preece <preece@predator.urbana.mcd.mot.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 1996 18:09:04 -0500
- To: papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca
- Cc: s-ping@orange.cv.tottori-u.ac.jp, marnellm@portia.portia.com, boo@best.com, www-html@w3.org
From: Paul Prescod <papresco@calum.csclub.uwaterloo.ca> | At 12:02 AM 7/2/96 +0900, Ka-Ping Yee wrote: | >> Netscape is still the clear winner, and likely to remain | >> so as long as Microsoft is interested only in proprietary | >> platforms (Windows and Macintosh)... | > | >Agreed. | | I disagree. Microsoft's browser will most likely dominate the majority of | the desktops on the planet running Microsoft operating systems. In fact, I | expect that by the middle of next year many people will be using a Microsoft | operating system where the browser is so integrated that Netscape feels | "different", as if you has installed a different command line shell or | desktop. --- Note that my original sentence, which preceded the quote above, limited "clear winner" to my particular usage, which requires support of non-Windows, non-Mac desktops. I agree with your guess. --- | Perhaps the best of all possible worlds would be for Netscape to maintain | dominance on Mac and Unix and Microsoft to dominate the rest. Having a | single standard encourages "coding to the browser" and that inevitably leads | to short-term thought out documents. In fact, the more their interfaces and | features diverge the more people will just have to encode documents | according to their structures and "trust the browser." --- I tend to agree. scott -- scott preece motorola/mcg urbana design center 1101 e. university, urbana, il 61801 phone: 217-384-8589 fax: 217-384-8550 internet mail: preece@urbana.mcd.mot.com
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 1996 19:07:39 UTC