- From: Ka-Ping Yee <s-ping@orange.cv.tottori-u.ac.jp>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jul 1996 20:39:51 +0900
- To: "Scott E. Preece" <preece@predator.urbana.mcd.mot.com>
- Cc: s-ping@orange.cv.tottori-u.ac.jp, marnellm@portia.portia.com, boo@best.com, www-html@w3.org
Scott E. Preece wrote: > > From Ka-Ping Yee: > > | It's a pity that Netscape... > | > | - doesn't support the ID attribute. > | ... > | Pity that. > --- > > I hope you see the irony in the fact that you simultaneously slam > Netscape for not cleaving to standards and for not implementing other > things that aren't in standards... I see no such contradiction. I noted items that were part of proposed standards which Netscape has ignored, and even though HTML 3.0 is expired now, i think that the life of HTML 3.0 would have turned out very differently if Netscape had paid attention to what was in it. And if you are referring specifically to ID, which doesn't happen to be in HTML 3.2 -- for which i have still heard no justification at all -- the ID attribute is certainly not dead, as it will be used with style sheets and is mentioned in a few WDs. Ping
Received on Monday, 1 July 1996 07:41:41 UTC