- From: Gregory J. Woodhouse <gjw@wnetc.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 16:50:33 -0800 (PST)
- To: Jonsm@aol.com
- Cc: www-html@www10.w3.org, ericgauthier <eric@gauthier.centre.edu>
On Mon, 12 Feb 1996 Jonsm@aol.com wrote: > 4) Extended HTML2 - tables and extensions common to several browsers. A > general rule could be that the extension must exist in at least four > browsers. > I think you're stacking the deck a bit here, seeing as Netscape and Internet Assistant are the two browsers which support extensive extensions. > 5) Vendor specific - pages that will only work on specific browsers (frames, > Java, VBScript, etc..) > > Vendors will need to provide a DTD to validate against. A page that is > lexicalyl correct yet fails 2-5 would be vendor specific where the vendor is > unknown. > How do you distinguish between vendor specific features and extenvions included in 4 above? Is it the provision (or not) of a DTD? > Sites that generate multiple pages based on the User-Agent field could get > more than one rating. > > Jon Smir, jonsm@aol.com > --- Gregory Woodhouse gjw@wnetc.com home page: http://www.wnetc.com/ resource page: http://www.wnetc.com/resource/
Received on Monday, 12 February 1996 21:48:18 UTC