Re: wherefore CGM?

Walter Ian Kaye wrote:
> 72dpi works out perfectly for me, since at 12" away I can't see the
individual
> pixels, yet if I scrunch close to the screen, I can actually see
where pixels
> end. Best of both worlds!

ZOOM! ZOOM ZOOM! ZOOM ZOOM ZOOM! (easier on the eyes)

David Perrell

Received on Friday, 6 December 1996 22:44:30 UTC