- From: Arnoud <galactus@htmlhelp.com>
- Date: Sun, 01 Dec 1996 20:02:03 +0100
- To: www-html@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- In article <199611302312.XAA05702@curia.ucc.ie>, Peter Flynn <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie> wrote: > I should have qualified that: I was speaking from the standpoint of > the experienced user. For a beginner I guess pretty much whatever > comes to hand, from HTML 2.0 to Cougar. With "beginner" I meant someone who is used to "testing" his site in Netscape, and has just been convinced that validating is a Good Thing. Do I tell him to drop his frames and go for HTML 3.2? Or use the expired HTML 3.0 draft? Or HTML Pro which covers everything? > I would not recommend HTML Pro for the beginner. Why not? Galactus - -- E-mail: galactus@htmlhelp.com .................... PGP Key: 512/63B0E665 Maintainer of WDG's HTML reference: <http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/> -----END PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Received on Sunday, 1 December 1996 14:11:57 UTC